Nope, but thanks! That answered my question!
Von: Hamada, Ondrej [mailto:ondrej.ham...@acision.com] Gesendet: Montag, 8. September 2014 09:35 An: Hüning, Christian; users@lists.opennebula.org Betreff: RE: CPU / vCPU Question Hi Christian, Have you read this: http://lists.opennebula.org/pipermail/users-opennebula.org/2014-August/04568 2.html O. From: Users [mailto:users-boun...@lists.opennebula.org] On Behalf Of Hüning, Christian Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2014 2:26 PM To: users@lists.opennebula.org <mailto:users@lists.opennebula.org> Subject: [one-users] CPU / vCPU Question Hi there, can anybody tell me why it would be desireable to provide e.g. 12 real CPUs and just one vCPU? This is something ONE lets me do. What would be use cases for the other way around (1 real CPU, 12 vCPUs)? I also did some benchmarking with sysbench under Linux and found that the only option making sense to me is having CPU == vCPU. But maybe I am missing something? Cheers, Christian ----------------------------------------------- Christian Hüning, BSc. Fakultät Technik und Informatik, Department Informatik Berliner Tor 7 20099 Hamburg Tel.: +49 40 / 42875 - 8436 Mobil: +49 40 / 180 55 44 5 Web: <http://www.mars-group.org> http://www.mars-group.org _____ This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied, disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an intended recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment and all copies and inform the sender. Thank you for understanding.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.opennebula.org http://lists.opennebula.org/listinfo.cgi/users-opennebula.org
