El Wednesday 27 February 2008 11:41:20 Iñaki Baz Castillo escribió: > Sure, anyway the exact changes to the RFC 3261 appear in the Section 8 of > the above draft.
Hi again Bogdan. After this could you please explain which is the exact behaviour of OpenSer in those issues? For example: - OpenSer keeps INVITE transaction info after 200 OK like suggested in the draft, is it? I'm sure it does it since a late INVITE retransmision is not forwarded to destination if a 200 OK was already received by OpenSer. - In "tm" mode, does OpenSer forward upstream responses not matching transaction? In case OpenSer drop them, its behaviour is the suggested in the draft. Thanks a lot. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
