Hi Juha, Well,.... this links to a discussion from more than an year ago - moving the parallel2serial converter and serial forking support from lcr to core. Already there are 2 core functions that are doing the same (more or less) and I will really like to see this step completed and remove the serialization support from lcr module - as you said, the module grows, and it should keep focused on the LCR functionality.
Regarding the q issue - I agree with your approach - instead of hacking the serialization engine, better play with q values before serialization. Is any common will on the first item (serialization to be moved out from LCR)? Because, if so, we should work out a plan of action. Regards, Bogdan Juha Heinanen wrote: > a few days ago there was a question on if lcr module is able to > serialize parallel forking of branches with the same q value. i > replied that there is no such capability in lcr module. > > now that i have thought about the matter a bit, in my opinion the best > solution is to write a separate serialize function that rewrites the q > values rather than trying adding yet another feature to already too > complex lcr module. > > -- juha > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > > _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
