Hi, thanks for your answer... I increased the SHM_MEM_SIZE to 64 and left KG_MEM_POOL_SIZE 4*1024*1024 . Anyway i found that is not possible to raise MAX_BRANCHES to values higher than 30 due to tm module internal limitation. Bye, Marcello
On Mar 12, 2008, at 12:16 PM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote: > Hi Marcello, > > Marcello Lupo wrote: >> Hi to all, >> due to a failover routing policy (serial forking) i need to >> increase the MAX_BRANCHES value to something like 35. >> Our gateways have limitation of 30 Channels ---> 1 IP . I have 32 >> of them available. >> Can this change have any heavy and dangerous effect on openser ?? >> > It should not. At least not a dangerous effect, but a slightly > increase of SHM memory - a transaction will be larger to accommodate > the higher number of branches. >> Just to know if i will need to increase memory aveilable or >> something like this. >> > Theoretically, it will be safer to increase a bit the SHM memory - > but this depends of how many simultaneous transaction you have - see > the TM statistics for this. >> I already use : >> >> /*used only if PKG_MALLOC is defined*/ >> #define PKG_MEM_POOL_SIZE 4*1024*1024 >> >> due to my eavy use of AVP. > This is wrong - AVPs use SHM memory and not PKG. > > Regards, > Bogdan >> Let me know if i need to increase it more than this. >> Thanks to all, >> Bye, >> Marcello >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> Users@lists.openser.org >> http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >> >> > _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.openser.org http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users