Hi Jeremy, Problems in bla were reported by someone else some time ago. I have worked at it and committed a fix in trunk. Unfortunately, as I waited for a positive reply and was also quite busy I did not manage to do the backport before the 1.3.1 release. I have applied the patch now in 1.3 branch. I am sorry I have to say this, but you should either take the presence, pua and pua_bla modules form the svn branch 1.3 or apply the patches.
Regards, Anca Vamanu Jeremy George wrote: > Hello All, > > I had bla working with v1.3.0, but it isn't with v1.3.1 . > > I didn't expect a maintenance release to require a configuration change, so > I am confused. V1.3.1 appears to need a pua_bla server address statement in > the modparams. I wasn't using one with v1.3.0, and it appears not to be > allowed. > > The presence server configuration is very simple, just about straight from > the example. It's attached as bla.cfg > > I think I have an idea about what's wrong, but not why. Attached also is > are ngrep traces of the first and second UAs registering correctly with v1.3.0 > and the first UA registering correctly with v1.3.1 . Then an ngrep trace of > the second UA registering incorrectly with v1.3.1 . The NOTIFY that should be > relayed from the second UA to the first is missing. The attached files are > named firstphone-register-130.log, secondphone-register-130.log, > firstphone-register-131.log and secondphone-register-131.log . > > Any pointers to the problem would be greatly appreciated. > > - Jeremy > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
