Hi, Actually, someone pointed out a previous discussion about that issue. Interesting read. http://www.openser.org/pipermail/users/2007-October/014049.html
Andreas Andreas Granig wrote: > Hi, > > One more question regarding the CANCEL processing: > > RFC says in ยง9.2 regarding the 200 for a CANCEL: > > #+ > This response is > constructed following the procedures described in Section 8.2.6 > noting that the To tag of the response to the CANCEL and the To tag > in the response to the original request SHOULD be the same. > #- > > OpenSER (1.3.1) on the other hand does generate a different To-tag and > doesn't use the one from the response of the original request. Why is > that? Anything we can do about this? > > Best regards, > Andreas > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
