I forgot to post the response to the original subscribe, where the to-tag is set. Now you can see that it is different from the one that appears in the subscribe that is sent when the presence status change.
SIP/2.0 202 OK Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.95.43.31;branch=z9hG4bKe5a9.a616d022.0 To: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=10.20757.1209988007.20 From: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=533cb9e91f4b999cf76861cbb9ed54ed-be94 CSeq: 10 SUBSCRIBE Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Expires: 473 Contact: <sip:10.95.43.31> Server: OpenSER (1.3.1-notls (i386/linux)) Content-Length: 0 Thanks again, Pablo -----Mensaje original----- De: Pablo Guijarro Enríquez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviado el: lunes, 05 de mayo de 2008 14:11 Para: 'Anca Vamanu' CC: '[email protected]' Asunto: RE: [OpenSER-Users] Problems with SIMPLE-XMPP presence Well, I have made some tests and I think I have found what could be a wrong behaviour of the pua_xmpp module, leading to the situation described in the previous post. I will try to explain it better here. Every time a XMPP client changes its presence status, pua_xmpp sends what seems to be re-subscribes for each of its contacts belonging to the SIP domain. The problem is that they are not linked with the original suscribes because they don't have the same To-Tag (neither have they the same branch in Via header, but I don't think that's important). For example: - PREVIOUS SUBSCRIBE: SUBSCRIBE sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.95.43.31;branch=z9hG4bKe5a9.a616d022.0 To: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] From: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=533cb9e91f4b999cf76861cbb9ed54ed-be94 CSeq: 10 SUBSCRIBE Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Length: 0 User-Agent: OpenSER (1.3.1-notls (i386/linux)) Max-Forwards: 70 Event: presence Contact: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Expires: 473 - NEW SUBSCRIBE AFTER STATUS CHANGE: SUBSCRIBE sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.95.43.31;branch=z9hG4bKf5a9.e1802f23.0 To: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=10.20757.1209988007.20 From: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=533cb9e91f4b999cf76861cbb9ed54ed-be94 CSeq: 11 SUBSCRIBE Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Length: 0 User-Agent: OpenSER (1.3.1-notls (i386/linux)) Max-Forwards: 70 Event: presence Contact: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Expires: 3610 As a result, the later subscribe request is rejected with a 404 Not Here response. The pua_xmpp, upon receiving the response, sends a brand new subscribe request, that has nothing to do with the others and is accepted by openser. When this is done for every contact the XMPP client has, I can see in database how presentity table has one more row that it had before (showing the last status change) and how active_watchers table has grown as many rows as contacts have been involved (one for each new suscribe). And they keep growing every time there is a change in the presence status of the XMPP client. So, please, let me know whether I am right and this is something to be fixed. Thank you, Pablo -----Mensaje original----- De: Pablo Guijarro Enríquez [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviado el: jueves, 17 de abril de 2008 17:56 Para: 'Anca Vamanu' Asunto: RE: [OpenSER-Users] Problems with SIMPLE-XMPP presence Thanks, Anca, that was it :) Now presence information is shown in both the SIP and the XMPP client, but there are still some estrange behaviours in openser. First, when I start the SIP client with the XMPP client already online, some kind of loop occurs, as you can see in the log attached. The following NOTIFY message is sent again and again for a while, changing just the from-tag, branch and call-id: NOTIFY sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.95.43.31;branch=z9hG4bK1d12.1b727435.0 To: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=533cb9e91f4b999cf76861cbb9ed54ed-38b3 From: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=10.1700.1208442687.20 CSeq: 2 NOTIFY Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Length: 471 User-Agent: OpenSER (1.3.1-notls (i386/linux)) Max-Forwards: 70 Event: presence Contact: <sip:10.95.43.31> Subscription-State: active;expires=2631 Content-Type: application/pidf+xml <...> The first couple of them get the following response, but not all the others, that get no answer: SIP/2.0 200 OK Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.95.43.31;branch=z9hG4bK1d12.1b727435.0 To: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=533cb9e91f4b999cf76861cbb9ed54ed-38b3 From: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=10.1700.1208442687.20 CSeq: 2 NOTIFY Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Server: OpenSER (1.3.1-notls (i386/linux)) Content-Length: 0 It seems that the responses are not taken into account, or maybe it is related with the other thing I find weird, the fact that pua and presentity tables in Mysql database grows continuously with registries that are much like already existing ones. Sample of the pua table: | 18432 | sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | | 1 | 1208449465 | 0 | 8 | a.1208441749.1702.41.0 | | | | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 18428 | sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | | 1 | 1208449357 | 0 | 8 | a.1208441749.1701.25.0 | 0xbf9787bc | | | | | 0 | NULL | | 0 | | | 18429 | sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | | 1 | 1208449356 | 0 | 16 | | | sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 10.1700.1208445755.35 | 533cb9e91f4b999cf76861cbb9ed54ed-9c6c | 10 | NULL | | 0 | | | 18420 | sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | | 1 | 1208446132 | 0 | 8 | a.1208441749.1700.12.0 | 0xbf9787bc | | | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 18427 | sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | | 1 | 1208449357 | 1208449345 | 16 | | | sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 10.1703.1208445756.21 | 533cb9e91f4b999cf76861cbb9ed54ed-463c | 10 | | | 0 | | | 18426 | sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | | 1 | 1208449357 | 1208449355 | 16 | | | sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | 6ce7eb9f | 10.1700.1208445756.36 | 533cb9e91f4b999cf76861cbb9ed54ed-6582 | 10 | | sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | 0 | | | 18423 | sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | | 1 | 1208446287 | 0 | 8 | a.1208441749.1701.17.0 | | | | | | 0 | | | 0 | | | 18425 | sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | | 1 | 1208449228 | 0 | 16 | | | sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | 6ce7eb98 | 10.1700.1208445628.32 | 533cb9e91f4b999cf76861cbb9ed54ed-da39 | 10 | | sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | 0 | | | 18438 | sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | | 1 | 1208449387 | 0 | 16 | | | sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 10.1703.1208445918.32 | 533cb9e91f4b999cf76861cbb9ed54ed-7095 | 10 | NULL | | 0 | Every time the XMPP client changes its presence state, one registry is added to the presentity table. Sample: | 783 | pge354*xmpp.domain | xmpp-gw | presence | a.1208441749.1701.36.1 | 1208449478 | 1208445878 | <?xml version="1.0"?> <presence xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf" xmlns:dm="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:data-model" xmlns:rpid="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:rpid" xmlns:c="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:cipid" entity="pres:[EMAIL PROTECTED]"> <tuple id="0xbf9787bc"> <status> <basic>open</basic> </status> </tuple> </presence> | | 785 | pge354*xmpp.domain | xmpp-gw | presence | a.1208441749.1702.45.0 | 1208449517 | 1208445917 | <?xml version="1.0"?> <presence xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf" xmlns:dm="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:data-model" xmlns:rpid="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:rpid" xmlns:c="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:cipid" entity="pres:[EMAIL PROTECTED]"> <tuple id="0xbf9787bc"> <status> <basic>open</basic> </status> </tuple> </presence> | | 786 | pge354*xmpp.domain | xmpp-gw | presence | a.1208441749.1702.52.1 | 1208450140 | 1208446540 | <?xml version="1.0"?> <presence xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf" xmlns:dm="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:data-model" xmlns:rpid="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:rpid" xmlns:c="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf:cipid" entity="pres:[EMAIL PROTECTED]"> <tuple id="0xbf9787bc"> <status> <basic>open</basic> </status> </tuple> <note>away</note> <person id="0xbf9787bc"> <activities/> <note>away</note> </person> </presence> How can I solve all this issues? Regards, Pablo -----Mensaje original----- De: Anca Vamanu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Enviado el: jueves, 17 de abril de 2008 11:13 Para: Pablo Guijarro Enríquez CC: [email protected] Asunto: Re: [OpenSER-Users] Problems with SIMPLE-XMPP presence Hello, There is something missing in your configuration file. See econfig example from version 1.3 (etc/openser.cfg, line 214). You should add something like this on the else branch for in dialog requests: if (is_method("SUBSCRIBE|NOTIFY") && ($rd == "your.server.ip.address"| $rd=="xmpp-gw")) { # in-dialog subscribe requests route(2); exit; } The way you have it now, all in dialog requests are not allowed, that is all Notifies and the in dialog Subscribes. regards, Anca Vamanu Pablo Guijarro Enríquez wrote: > Hi again, > > Sorry about the delay and thanks for your support. I did so, but it still > does not work. The fact is that the subscription to the XMPP user is sent > from the SIP user and reaches openser, which sends back a notify request > with no presence information at all. In between there is not exchange of > information with the XMPP either. > > Then openser sends itself the couple of subscribe requests mentioned in my > later post (now both with sip:10.95.43.31 as contact header), the first of > which is rejected (due to the to-tag, I suppose), while the second one is > accepted. As a result of that request, a notify is sent towards itself, but > it is rejected with a 404 Not Here response. This one do carry some presence > information, but nothing interesting: > > Content-Type: application/watcherinfo+xml > > <?xml version="1.0"?> > <watcherinfo xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:watcherinfo" version="0" > state="full"> > <watcher-list resource="sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > package="presence"/> > </watcherinfo> > > Let me know whether that behaviour is the expected one or not, and what the > reason could be for it not to work (see log attached). > > Regards, > Pablo > > > -----Mensaje original----- > De: Anca Vamanu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Enviado el: viernes, 11 de abril de 2008 15:51 > Para: Pablo Guijarro Enríquez > CC: [email protected] > Asunto: Re: [OpenSER-Users] Problems with SIMPLE-XMPP presence > > Hi, > > You need to add a host alias for 'xmpp-gw' on the machine running > openser. OpenSER does dns lookup to figure out if the destination is it, > and the R-URI has a special meaning in presence so it should be kept > with that key. > As for the contact, please change the parameter to 'sip:10.95.43.31 ' > > regards, > Anca > > Pablo Guijarro Enríquez wrote: > >> Yes, you were right. Now errors have disappeared, but still there is not >> exchange of information between servers. >> >> In the log there are a couple of things that I find strange. The first one >> is that at some point openser tries to resolve xmpp-gw, which is only the >> key to mark users from the xmpp domain. >> >> The second is that, upon receiving the subscription from the client, >> > openser > >> first sends itself a subscription request, with the IP address established >> in the pua_xmpp server_address parameter as Contact header value, which is >> answered with a 404 response, and then it sends the same request but >> changing the Contact header to the URI sip:openser.domain:5060, which is >> accepted with a 200 response (see both below). Is that OK? Or should I >> change that parameter to the URI, despite the instructions given in the >> module documentation? >> >> >> SUBSCRIBE sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SIP/2.0 >> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.95.43.31;branch=z9hG4bKbca.c6e4c5f1.0 >> To: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=10.12575.1207664296.3 >> From: >> > sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=533cb9e91f4b999cf76861cbb9ed54ed-2ab3 > >> CSeq: 11 SUBSCRIBE >> Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Content-Length: 0 >> User-Agent: OpenSER (1.3.1-notls (i386/linux)) >> Max-Forwards: 70 >> Event: presence.winfo >> Contact: <10.95.43.31> >> Expires: 3610 >> >> >> SUBSCRIBE sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SIP/2.0 >> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.95.43.31;branch=z9hG4bKafa2.9020b137.0 >> To: sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> From: sip: >> > [EMAIL PROTECTED];tag=533cb9e91f4b999cf76861cbb9ed54ed-5c38 > >> CSeq: 10 SUBSCRIBE >> Call-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Content-Length: 0 >> User-Agent: OpenSER (1.3.1-notls (i386/linux)) >> Max-Forwards: 70 >> Event: presence.winfo >> Contact: <sip:openser.domain:5060> >> Expires: 3610 >> >> >> Thanks again, >> Paul >> >> >> -----Mensaje original----- >> De: Anca Vamanu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Enviado el: martes, 08 de abril de 2008 16:07 >> Para: Pablo Guijarro Enríquez >> CC: [email protected] >> Asunto: Re: [OpenSER-Users] Problems with SIMPLE-XMPP presence >> >> Try compiling the pua_xmpp module; it has some references in pua module >> that I guess have been broken. >> >> Anca >> >> Pablo Guijarro Enríquez wrote: >> >> >>> Thanks Anca, >>> >>> I tried what you told me. The message about not sending subscribe is no >>> >>> >> more >> >> >>> shown, but some new errors appear and presence does not work yet. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Paul >>> >>> -----Mensaje original----- >>> De: Anca Vamanu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Enviado el: martes, 08 de abril de 2008 14:30 >>> Para: Pablo Guijarro Enríquez >>> CC: [email protected] >>> Asunto: Re: [OpenSER-Users] Problems with SIMPLE-XMPP presence >>> >>> Hi Pablo, >>> >>> There was an optimization in pua version included in 1.3.1 release that >>> sometimes prevented the presence sip-xmpp gateway from working ( related >>> to the message "Found previous request for unlimited subscribe- do not >>> send subscribe") from the log. >>> This was removed in the svn version of the branch. I advise you to take >>> the pua module from svn 1.3 branch. >>> >>> regards, >>> Anca Vamanu >>> >>> >>> Pablo Guijarro Enríquez wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> Hi everybody, >>>> >>>> I have some problems to get presence information exchanged between SIP >>>> users and xmpp ones. SIP clients (X-Lite) depend on an openser server >>>> v1.3.1, with all necessary modules working within it, and xmpp clients >>>> (Psi) rely on an xmpp server (ejabberd) which is in the same machine. >>>> >>>> The link between both sip and xmpp servers is established when openser >>>> starts, and the exchange of instant messages between sip and xmpp >>>> users works fine. So does presence too, as long as there are only sip >>>> users or only xmpp users involved, but it does not work between the >>>> two worlds in any direction. Moreover, I do not see any packet being >>>> exchanged between the sip and the xmpp servers when a user from one >>>> domain subscribe to one from the other, or when they change their >>>> > status. > >>>> I dont know what the problem can be. No errors appear in the log and >>>> I thought adding xmpp presence to openser would be straightforward >>>> once the IM was already working. >>>> >>>> Openser config file and part of the log file (the subscription to an >>>> xmpp user) are attached. Hope someone can give me some clue. >>>> >>>> Thanks in advance! >>>> >>>> Paul >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Users mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
