Hi Juha, As later proofed in the reports, the actual problem was openser un-related - the delay/bottleneck was not in openser - just because of the integration.
On the other hand, I agree with Henning's statement, that comparing with 1.1, openser 1.3 is a bit slower, but probably the difference is small and noticeable only is special cases - this comes form the overhead added due intensive usage of PV in function parameters, adding extra internal APIs, etc... Regards, Bogdan Juha Heinanen wrote: > also i did some performance tests on openser trunk in order to clear > doubt that has been expressed recently. > > with only 4 child processes and several radius/mysql queries per invite, > i was able to achieve 50 new calls per second using sipp including > radius accounting to database of each call. this was on my two years > old laptop and everything was running on the same host. i didn't try > yet how many calls i could have achieved before retransmissions. > > i'm satisfied with the result and don't think that there are any > performance issues with openser trunk. > > -- juha > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > > _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
