El Thursday 05 June 2008 17:34:11 Juha Heinanen escribió: > Iñaki Baz Castillo writes: > > Why? Obviously the INVITE **does include** Proxy-Authorization. > > Maybe RC3261 says that a server must not challenge for authentication a > > user with From "Anonymous" <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ? > > inaki, > > you can configure twinkle to include p-p-i header that includes real > from uri and then use information in that to authenticate the caller.
Hi Juha, I already do it (option enabled). Please, note that the second INVITE Twinkle sends after 407 includes PPI: P-Preferred-Identity: "IBC" <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> So all is correct. The second INVITE includes: - CSeq + 1 - Proxy-Authorization with credentials and realm asked in the 407. But OpenSer "proxy_authorize()" replies again -4 (no credentials). All seems correct, this is why I think taht maybe RFC3261 disallows chanllenge for request with "From" == "Anonymous" <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. Thanks. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
