10 jun 2008 kl. 18.02 skrev Aymeric Moizard: > > > > On Tue, 10 Jun 2008, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: > >> El Tuesday 10 June 2008 13:59:42 Aymeric Moizard escribió: >>> Stun can work even behind symmetric NAT if the stun server was >>> running on the same socket the SIP server is running... I hope >>> this feature will come soon! >> >> Sure? AFAIK a symmetric NAT not only depends on the destination IP >> but also on the port. So unless you have a STUN server listening in >> all the ports available for RTP proxing you don't know if STUN will >> work. > > Right. > 1-> I'm talking about SIP and contact management. (not about RTP). > In this > case, the STUN server must be on the same socket as the SIP server. > This > is planned in 'outbound' draft from ietf. > Yes, that is something I need to fix in that "other b2bua" as well... I haven't seen this being used much, but have seen that I can enable it in Eyebeam. Going to try now. If I get disconnected from the Internet, you guys know what happened... :-)
Anyone knows any more about the outbound draft and it's progress through the IETF? /O _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
