Hello all!
I'll have to resubmit this issue as it's still a problem for my
installed cluster.
My environment consists of 2 masters and one load-balancer that has the
default HAProxy installed by the automated install procedure via the
openshift-ansible project. So it's basically the "default" version for a
cluster with 2 masters.
What I find is that the config map for the web-console gets created by
default with one of the masters as consolePublicURL and masterPublicURL
and not the load-balancer entry-point, as I would have expected.
So if I try to simulate a master fail for the host that's configured in
the configMap, this effectively means that I cannot reach the
webconsole, even though I do have the second master available.
I have tried editing the configMap for the webconsole and the
oauthclient openshift-web-console, but this results in invalid request
errors when trying to access the web-console via a web-browser.
The important edits are:
- in configmap webconsole-config:
consolePublicURL: https://loadbalancer.my.net:8443/console/
masterPublicURL: https://loadbalancer.my.net:8443
- in oauthclient openshift-web-console:
redirectURIs:
- https://loadbalancer.my.net:8443/
- https://master1.my.net:8443/console/
- https://master2.my.net:8443/console/
I've already gone through some mail exchanges with Sam Padgett who has
pointed out that it might be load-balancer config related, but, as I
stated, the load-balancer is the default one configured by the
installer. The HAProxy config file seems to be the default one provided
in the openshift-ansible project.
I'd appreciate if you have any ideas about where to look for this problem.
Thanks in advance!
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users@lists.openshift.redhat.com
http://lists.openshift.redhat.com/openshiftmm/listinfo/users
