Hi Iñaki, you suggestion was brilliant. I can store the uri(s) is avp $(avp(s:uri)[n]) = $ru then put n in via header, and get it on 200 reply. I'll try. Thanks
PS I remember that in via header there is alrealy branch number (.1 .2 .3 and so on) Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: > > 2009/2/2 stefanoIT <[email protected]>: >> >> So there is no a solution to my problem. At the moment. > > You can also process each generated branch in "branch_route" and add > the RURI value as Via or Record-Route parameter. For example: > > branch_route[X] { > add_rr_param(";branch_ruri_user=$rU"); > add_rr_param(";branch_ruri_hostport=$rd:$rp"); > } > > Later in reply_route you can check those parameters in Record-Route by > using "check_route_param": > http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/1.5.x/rr.html#check-route-param-id > > But Record-route will only exist if the reply is 2XX, if not it's not > required. So using "Via" parameters would be a better choice. > > > Note however that "@" char is not valid as a header parameter > according to the SIP BNF grammar. This is why I split the TUTI into > user and host parts. > > > > -- > Iñaki Baz Castillo > <[email protected]> > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > > -- View this message in context: http://n2.nabble.com/parallel-forking-tp2257204p2258779.html Sent from the OpenSIPS - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
