2009/4/30 Dan Pascu <d...@ag-projects.com>: > On Thursday 30 April 2009, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: >> Yes, I agree on it. However I just wanted to mean that using a >> media-proxy is not the best solution for all the cases, specially when >> clients are behind same NAT (an office for example) and the PBX/Proxy >> is hosted in some datacenter. > > There is no reliable way to detect if 2 devices are in the same LAN behind > NAT.
Yes, this should be configurable by the provider depending on the client topology (not just "auto-detect"). >> Also, for calls to a gateway in our same datacenter, forcing the RTP >> through a media-proxy is not the only solution. Using SessionTimers >> (so a B2BUA is required and not just a proxy) is also a good solution >> (and cheaper since no servers are needed for relaying the media). > > That is not actually accurate. Why not? > No _new_ servers are needed, as in you can > reuse any existing server for this purpose. Nowadays mediaproxy is very > efficient because it uses conntrack rules in the kernel to forward the > packets. It does forward hundreds of media streams with virtually no load > on the CPU, And if I need thousands of media streams? wouldn't I need more servers? Regards. -- Iñaki Baz Castillo <i...@aliax.net> _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users