Hello Bobby, Let me test this scenario.
Regards, Bogdan Bobby Smith wrote: > Hello, > > I've currently got the load balancer set up with a single group (we'll > call it "handset", as our opensips server using the loadbalancing is > just acting as a registrar/proxy to a softswitch). > > This is how it's defined in the database table: > > "1";1;"sip:1.2.3.4";"handset=75";"server1" > "2";1;"sip:sip:1.2.3.5";"handset=75";"server2" > "3";1;"sip:sip:1.2.3.6";"handset=75";"server3" > "4";1;"sip:sip:1.2.3.7";"handset=75";"server4" > "5";1;"sip:sip:1.2.3.8";"handset=75";"server5" > "6";1;"sip:sip:1.2.3.9";"handset=75";"server6" > "7";1;"sip:sip:1.2.3.10";"handset=75";"server7" > "8";1;"sip:1.2.3.11";"handset=75";"server8" > "9";1;"sip:1.2.3.12";"handset=75";"server9" > "10";1;"sip:1.2.3.13";"handset=75";"server10" > "11";1;"sip:1.2.3.14";"handset=75";"server11" > "12";1;"sip:1.2.3.15";"handset=75";"server12" > "13";1;"sip:1.2.3.16";"handset=75";"server13" > > When active, it seems the load balancer is only sending to the first 4 > servers in the list: > > [r...@cloud_registrar_lb mnt]# opensipsctl fifo lb_list > Destination:: sip:1.2.3.4 id=1 > Resource:: handset max=75 load=75 > Destination:: sip:1.2.3.5 id=2 > Resource:: handset max=75 load=75 > Destination:: sip:1.2.3.6 id=3 > Resource:: handset max=75 load=75 > Destination:: sip:1.2.3.7 id=4 > Resource:: handset max=75 load=75 > Destination:: sip:1.2.3.8 id=5 > Resource:: handset max=75 load=0 > Destination:: sip:1.2.3.9 id=6 > Resource:: handset max=75 load=0 > Destination:: sip:1.2.3.10 id=7 > Resource:: handset max=75 load=0 > Destination:: sip:1.2.3.11 id=8 > Resource:: handset max=75 load=0 > Destination:: sip:1.2.3.12 id=9 > Resource:: handset max=75 load=0 > Destination:: sip:1.2.3.13 id=10 > Resource:: handset max=75 load=0 > Destination:: sip:1.2.3.14 id=11 > Resource:: handset max=75 load=0 > Destination:: sip:1.2.3.15 id=12 > Resource:: handset max=75 load=0 > Destination:: sip:1.2.3.16 id=13 > Resource:: handset max=75 load=0 > > I don't see anything in the log identifying that we're even try to > send anything beyond the first 4 servers, and an ngrep confirms that > it's essentially balancing messages to just the first four without > trying the rest. > > Any thoughts? I'm using the 1.5.1 version of the load balancer. > > Thanks, > > Bobby S > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > _______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
