On Jul 24, 2009, at 6:13 PM, Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana wrote: > On Friday 24 July 2009 16:49:40 Adrian Georgescu wrote: >> Carlo, >> >> We use only Debian development branch both for the development of our >> software and for our deployments. If you use Debian unstable you are >> the safest as we are testing and using our packages only this >> environment. >> >> While the name 'stable' brings some confidence for the inexperienced, >> in practice when it comes to bleeding edge developments like we do, >> the stable version can become obsolete fast and you could be stuck by >> running it because of the dependencies that do not make it to the >> stable branch as soon as we develop our software. When things do not >> work you will hear the same story "your distribution is too old" to >> run this software. >> >> So the most stable distribution is unstable. > > That's too wilde Adrian !!! ... and abosolut wrong, I don't agree at > all. > All the systems I run/install run Debian stable, and if I need some > blending > edge soft I backport it to stable.
I am glad you can port it easily. > Backporting mediaproxy it's a very simple task, as it's a "very > simple" > dependency software. This simply means that the developers who did not aim to support your environment exceeded the expectations and did a very good job. > -- > Raúl Alexis Betancor Santana > Dimensión Virtual > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users@lists.opensips.org > http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
