Inaki, Why do you complain about having features in a software that you did not write just because you do not see a personally use in them?
Adrian On Jul 28, 2009, at 10:19 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: > El Martes, 28 de Julio de 2009, Alex Balashov escribió: >> It's worth pointing out that no member of the OpenSER project stack >> has >> been a "pure" SIP proxy for very long; they have certain UAS >> features >> (registrar, PUA, NAT ping, etc.) As Bogdan said, a pure proxy >> would not >> be terribly useful in most scenarios in which the project is >> deployed. > > I don't agree, let me explain: > > OpenSER has been: > - Pure SIP proxy :) > - Registrar server > - Presence server > > (I don't mention "redirect server" since IMHO is a stupid concept). > > > However, today's OpenSIPS features include dialog management and SDP > mangling. > These features are supposed to be implemented in a B2BUA, not in a > proxy (all > of us already know the real limitations of the dialog module > concerning to > security, forking scenarios, PRACK...). > > In the above other cases (registrar, presence server), OpenSIPS > behaves as an > UAS, not as a proxy, so OpenSIPS implements the appropiate role for > such > tasks. > > Anyhow, if the new "exotic" features work, go on :) > > > > -- > Iñaki Baz Castillo <i...@aliax.net> > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users@lists.opensips.org > http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users