The SST module is designed for a scenario in which the proxy serves as 
the endpoint of the SST negotiation.  Otherwise, SST is up to the UA 
endpoints to negotiate amongst themselves.  So, SST does not deal with a 
situation in which the proxy *receives* a 422;  it only equips the proxy 
to *send* a 422 if the Min-SE value from the request initiator does not 
meet *its* desiderata.

Jeff Pyle wrote:

> It seems very strange to me to have to manually manipulate headers that an
> Opensips module added in the first place.  Seems like bad things could
> happen if the modules expects them to be there with certain values and they
> have different values or gone altogether.  If these headers are added in the
> request route does the same rule apply as with append_hf(), that is, they
> cannot be removed?
> 
> The whole thing just seems odd.
> 
> 
> - Jeff
> 
> 
> 
> On 8/18/09 9:01 AM, "Alex Balashov" <abalas...@evaristesys.com> wrote:
> 
>> If I'm understanding the documentation correctly, you'd probably have to
>> do this with manual header manipulation.
>>
>> Jeff Pyle wrote:
>>
>>> On 8/18/09 8:51 AM, "Alex Balashov" <abalas...@evaristesys.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Sure, use a failure route and append_branch().
>>> Ok, but how do I adjust the timer value so it doesn't get 422'd again?  Or
>>> is this handled automatically?  The SST module documentation doesn't appear
>>> to cover this.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> - Jeff
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Users mailing list
>>> Users@lists.opensips.org
>>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users@lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users


-- 
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems
Web     : http://www.evaristesys.com/
Tel     : (+1) (678) 954-0670
Direct  : (+1) (678) 954-0671

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to