RURI has nothing to do with the VIA part.. Also RURI is not to be changed during loose_route(), only if you have a strict router proxy in front of you....maybe you can post the inbound and outbound request (to see how the loose_route() is done)
Regards, Bogdan Jeff Kronlage wrote: > The RURI. > > Thanks, > > Jeff > > -----Original Message----- > From: users-boun...@lists.opensips.org > [mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] On Behalf Of Bogdan-Andrei > Iancu > Sent: Monday, October 19, 2009 9:13 PM > To: OpenSIPS users mailling list > Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] NAT fixup question > > Jeff, > > the VIA hdr does not require mangling - the addition of the "received" > param is enough to handle nat issues. So the VIA you posted is correct > form NAT traversal point of view. > > Regarding the user part of the URI - what URI you are talking about? > RURI ? TO / FROM uri? Contact URI ? > > Regards, > Bogdan > > Jeff Kronlage wrote: > >> Thanks Bogdan, >> >> An unrelated question: >> >> Does anything special need to be done with "via" statements when >> implementing NAT transversal? >> >> Fix_nated_contact() takes care of the contact field for me, but I >> > still > >> end up with: >> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP >> >> > 192.168.1.105:5060;rport=42080;received=64.YYY.XX.XX;branch=z9hG4bK-e4e5 > >> cd84 >> >> I'm having some random problems with the user part of the URI randomly >> vanishing after I call loose_route() when NAT is involved, and I'm >> thinking these are related. >> >> Thanks, >> >> -- >> Jeff Kronlage >> Senior IT Engineer, Data102 >> 102 South Tejon, Suite #1250 >> Colorado Springs, CO 80903 >> (719) 387-0000 x 1335 direct >> (719) 578-8844 fax >> j...@data102.com / http://www.data102.com >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: users-boun...@lists.opensips.org >> [mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] On Behalf Of Bogdan-Andrei >> Iancu >> Sent: Monday, October 19, 2009 4:07 PM >> To: OpenSIPS users mailling list >> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Additional info on potential >> > registration > >> issue >> >> so DB ONLY mode......simply ignore the warning (see its meaning in my >> previous post) . The contacts will still be shared, but the socket >> information discarded. >> >> Regards, >> Bogdan >> >> Jeff Kronlage wrote: >> >> >>> Usrloc mode is 3. >>> >>> -- >>> Jeff Kronlage >>> Senior IT Engineer, Data102 >>> 102 South Tejon, Suite #1250 >>> Colorado Springs, CO 80903 >>> (719) 387-0000 x 1335 direct >>> (719) 578-8844 fax >>> j...@data102.com / http://www.data102.com >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: users-boun...@lists.opensips.org >>> [mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] On Behalf Of Bogdan-Andrei >>> Iancu >>> Sent: Monday, October 19, 2009 11:32 AM >>> To: OpenSIPS users mailling list >>> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Additional info on potential >>> >>> >> registration >> >> >>> issue >>> >>> So, this is the problem - each opensips instance loads only the >>> > usrloc > >>> >>> >> >> >>> records that have the a local socket corresponding to that instance. >>> >>> >> In >> >> >>> other words, if the record was saved by the other instance, opensips >>> will not load it. >>> >>> what db_mode do you use for usrloc? >>> >>> Regards, >>> Bogdan >>> >>> Jeff Kronlage wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> Yes, shared location table over multiple servers. >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: users-boun...@lists.opensips.org >>>> [mailto:users-boun...@lists.opensips.org] On Behalf Of Bogdan-Andrei >>>> Iancu >>>> Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2009 10:33 PM >>>> To: OpenSIPS users mailling list >>>> Subject: Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] Additional info on potential >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> registration >>> >>> >>> >>>> issue >>>> >>>> Hi Jeff, >>>> >>>> Do you use a shared location table (via multiple registrar servers) >>>> > ? > >>>> Regards, >>>> Bogdan >>>> >>>> Jeff Kronlage wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> I'm getting this over and over in my syslog: >>>>> >>>>> WARNING:usrloc:get_all_db_ucontacts: non-local socket >>>>> <udp:HI.DDE.N.12:5060>...ignoring >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> >>>>> Jeff >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> Users@lists.opensips.org >> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> Users@lists.opensips.org >> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >> >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users@lists.opensips.org > http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users@lists.opensips.org > http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > > _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
