Hola Iñaki Here is the SIP flow you asked me. Hope it helps to spot the problem. Observe the watcher is behind NAT.
SUBSCRIBE sip:present...@presence.net <sip%3apresent...@presence.net>SIP/2.0 Record-Route: <sip:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:6666;lr=on> Call-ID: d041f6cae786fea76503d43658570...@10.1.1.235 CSeq: 1 SUBSCRIBE From: "watcher" <sip:watc...@presence.net <sip%3awatc...@presence.net> >;tag=94671740 To: <sip:present...@presence.net <sip%3apresent...@presence.net>> Via: SIP/2.0/UDP xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:6666;branch=z9hG4bK581b.d3f0fa41.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.1.1.235:5060 ;rport=5060;received=yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy;branch=z9hG4bKc5Obqwa8W Max-Forwards: 69 Contact: <sip:watc...@10.1.1.235:5060;transport=tcp> Event: presence Expires: 3600 User-Agent: XXX Accept: application/pidf+xml Content-Length: 0 SIP/2.0 200 OK Record-Route: <sip:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:6666;lr=on> Call-ID: d041f6cae786fea76503d43658570...@10.1.1.235 CSeq: 1 SUBSCRIBE From: "watcher" <sip:watc...@presence.net <sip%3awatc...@presence.net> >;tag=94671740 To: <sip:present...@presence.net <sip%3apresent...@presence.net> >;tag=9886f112d485ff608a79084eaa27a247-6965 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:6666;branch=z9hG4bK581b.d3f0fa41.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 10.1.1.235:5060 ;rport=5060;received=yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy;branch=z9hG4bKc5Obqwa8W Expires: 120 Contact: <sip:s...@xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:6667> Server: OpenSIPS (1.6.1-notls (x86_64/linux)) Content-Length: 0 NOTIFY sip:watc...@10.1.1.235:5060;transport=tcp SIP/2.0 Via: SIP/2.0/UDP xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:6667;branch=z9hG4bK581b.fd70f1f5.0 To: <sip:watc...@presence.net <sip%3awatc...@presence.net>>;tag=94671740 From: <sip:present...@presence.net <sip%3apresent...@presence.net> >;tag=9886f112d485ff608a79084eaa27a247-6965 CSeq: 1 NOTIFY Call-ID: d041f6cae786fea76503d43658570...@10.1.1.235 Route: <sip:xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:6666;lr=on> Content-Length: 1030 User-Agent: OpenSIPS (1.6.1-notls (x86_64/linux)) Max-Forwards: 70 Event: presence Contact: <sip:s...@xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:6667> Subscription-State: active;expires=120 Content-Type: application/pidf+xml [...] Cheers Pascal On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 4:23 PM, Iñaki Baz Castillo <i...@aliax.net> wrote: > 2010/3/10 Pascal Maugeri <pascal.maug...@gmail.com>: > > Hi Anca > > We just tested the patch you sent us but we don't see any difference. > > Could you paste a SIP flow for the SUBSCRIBE and NOTIFY? > > -- > Iñaki Baz Castillo > <i...@aliax.net> > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users@lists.opensips.org > http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users