On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Olle E. Johansson <[email protected]> wrote:
> Talking as an Asterisk developer, I can say that handling 100 calls > simultaneously is no problem today. From Asterisk 1.4 we added a very fast > RTPproxy-alike briding code that will be used - as you say, if you don't > make it not happen. Transcoding, PBX services and other things will reduce > the amount of calls. Asterisk is highly multithreaded and I've done over > 10.000 channels on a recent HP server without any issues, using the p2p rtp > bridge, which is normally what you use if you only want billing. Handling > 2000 channels on a recent server should be no issue - it depends on the NIC > interface a lot, but that problem affects ALL rtp proxys. > > Just pointing out that your thought of Asterisk propably apply to very, > very old versions of Asterisk. > > Olle, I'm sure it is. I knew someone would come back with the 10,000 number, but wasn't expecting you :) For what its worth, you're one of the few people I'd trust hearing that number from. I'm curious what your experience with CPS limits looks like. -Brett
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
