Victor Gamov wrote: > On 20.10.2010 20:28, Stanisław Pitucha wrote: >> On 20/10/10 15:08, Victor Gamov wrote: >>> Ca somebody explain me which result expected when loose_route() called >>> by X.X.X.X for request like following: >>> >>> ----- >>> ACK sip:5700...@x.x.x.x SIP/2.0. >>> Record-Route:<sip:X.X.X.X;lr=on> >>> To:<sip:5700...@domain.com>;tag=4ded008d6ca9692485d1918f60c7da12 >>> ----- >>> >>> I hope that (as RFC3261 says at 16.12): >>> -- topmost (and single) Route removed (this route node has been >>> reached) >> No "Route:" header is removed. There are no route headers in this >> packet. > > Oops! > > Sorry for my mistake. Original packet is: > > ------- > ACK sip:5700...@x.x.x.x SIP/2.0. > Route:<sip:X.X.X.X;lr=on> > To:<sip:5700...@domain.com>;tag=4ded008d6ca9692485d1918f60c7da12 > ------- In this case the Route hdr is removed (as consumed) and the loose_route() function true (Route driven). $du will not be set as the only routing info in the request is the RURI, which is the default SIP routing.
Regards, Bogdan -- Bogdan-Andrei Iancu OpenSIPS Bootcamp 15 - 19 November 2010, Edison, New Jersey, USA www.voice-system.ro _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
