Load balancing is the same in both. What I was saying is that in some networks you may find the need to use both. I was not suggesting that you need to do that. Each has a slightly different subset of modules outside the that each developer made after the split. So potentially you would have a case where one module that you absolutely need is not available in the version your using On Aug 15, 2011 8:52 AM, "Nick Khamis" <sym...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > Thank you all for your responses, > > David: The topology hiding feature looks interesting, will defiantly > follow up on it. In terms of running both solutions on the same > network, we would rather stick with one that offers most of what we > are looking for.... > > Mark: No need for flame wars, it's always good to keep the user > community in mind. > > In terms of high availability and more importantly load balancing, do > both projects use the same implementation? > > Thanks in Advance, > > Nick > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users@lists.opensips.org > http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
