On Aug 18, 2011, at 2:26 PM, Jeff Pyle wrote: > Hi Saúl, > > On Aug 18, 2011, at 4:03 AM, Saúl Ibarra Corretgé wrote: > >> Calling route(x) from the failure route is not the same as getting a new >> message into the proxy. When you add headers to the message in the main >> route you can't remove them in the failure route, you need to use a branch >> route. Same case applies here. In the case you described above you would >> call use_media_proxy twice for the same message. > > I'm not doing anything relay-related in the failure route. If we land in the > failure route due to a carrier's 503, we immediately return to the request > route via the route[x] call to evaluate the next carrier, deciding at this > point whether or not we need any relay functions based on the needs this > time, and to some extent what happened last time. >
Calling route(x) will not magically bring you to the main route (route(0) really). You may execute the same code, but you are in a different state, because the request failed. -- Saúl Ibarra Corretgé AG Projects _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
