Hi Robert,
1.8 is expected for early 2012 (Feb, March ?). The full roadmap will be
uploaded on the web site in the next days - we just had some discussions
about what should be there or not :)
Again, this is the "natural" roadmap and timeframe for the project.
Sometime we also have devel on demand, which goes faster.
Regards,
Bogdan
On 09/15/2011 04:35 AM, Robert Thomas wrote:
I know perhaps it's a little too soon since we just have 1.7 out, to
know when to expect 1.8 but in a general point of view, whats is the
road map for 1.8, end this year, early next one?
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
<bog...@opensips.org <mailto:bog...@opensips.org>> wrote:
will be 1.8....2.0 is a completely different thing.
Regards,
Bogdan
On 09/14/2011 09:10 PM, duane.lar...@gmail.com
<mailto:duane.lar...@gmail.com> wrote:
Will this "distributed version" be in a 1.7 version or 1.8 or the
expected 2.0?
On Sep 14, 2011 12:50pm, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
<bog...@opensips.org> <mailto:bog...@opensips.org> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi Robert,
>
>
>
>
>
> This is cannot be done with the actual code (there is no way to
>
> share the dialog infos with other opensips instance), but, for
next
>
> release, we are working on a distributed version for several
modules
>
> like dialog, usrloc, load-balanced, pike, ratelimit
>
>
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Bogdan
>
>
>
>
>
> On 09/14/2011 07:41 PM, Robert Thomas wrote:
>
> Hello List,
>
>
>
>
>
> I currently have this setup.
>
>
>
>
>
> Opensips -> Asterisk farm
>
>
>
>
>
> Opensips is using the dialog module and Load balancer module.
>
> Right now the Opensips keeps track of the amount of active dialogs
>
> and balance calls between my server farm.
>
>
>
>
>
> I would like to have two opensips doing balancing for a few
>
> reason. My concern is if I give 2 IPs to my customers, each server
>
> will know how many active channel has againts the GW but is not a
>
> realistic number. Each Opensips keeps its own count.
>
>
>
>
>
> I remember the t_replicate function from a bootcamp, so I was
>
> wondering if this could be a situation to use it and how.
>
>
>
>
>
> Has anyone tried this setup and what would be the best approach
>
> for scalability.
>
>
>
>
> --
>
>
> Robert
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Users mailing list
>
> Users@lists.opensips.org <mailto:Users@lists.opensips.org>
>
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
>
> OpenSIPS eBootcamp - 19th of September 2011
>
> OpenSIPS solutions and "know-how"
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org <mailto:Users@lists.opensips.org>
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
--
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS eBootcamp - 19th of September 2011
OpenSIPS solutions and "know-how"
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org <mailto:Users@lists.opensips.org>
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
--
Robert
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
--
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS eBootcamp - 19th of September 2011
OpenSIPS solutions and "know-how"
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
