Hi John Did you try changing the Call-ID of every INVITE? "Merged Request" should be generated with requests that have same From tag, Call-ID, and CSeq https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3261#section-8.2.2.2
Regards, On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 2:09 AM, John Nash <john.nash...@gmail.com> wrote: > I am testing one setup where opensips drouting module sends call to > "Freeswitch" and I encountered one situation ... > > UA sends Invite to opensips, opensips uses drouting module and sends > Invite to Freeswitch , callee rejects the call and opensips sends ACK to > freeswitch and sends second invite (from failure route). This second invite > (which has same call id but different branch in via) is not treated as > another transaction by freeswitch and it sends back SIP 482 Request merged > response. > > I had the same setup tested using SEMS as SBC some times back > successfully. I am not sure which side this issue should be taken care of > (opensips or freeswitch) > > I looked in some freeswitch mail archives and in one post I can see > someone suggesting that from opensips side we should increase Cseq in case > of second invite. I think this can be done using script but I am not sure > if i should do or not. > This is the post > > http://lists.freeswitch.org/pipermail/freeswitch-users/2013-February/092600.html > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users@lists.opensips.org > http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > > -- NguyenVD
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
