Hello Bogdan, Thank you I will just ignore them. I have one more related issue. I am using uac_replace_from in auto mode along with topology_hiding. In a case when UA sends opensips a REInvite , my end carrier seem to completely ignore the Reinvite. I noticed that From URI in original Invite is different from the one sent in Reinvite (Only change is caller ID)....
Is there something I should know when mixing topology_hiding function and uac_replace_from? Regards John On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 9:57 PM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bog...@opensips.org> wrote: > Hi John, > > The module complains of receiving in Early state a reply without "tag" > param in TO header - something like that is bogus. > > Best regards, > > Bogdan-Andrei Iancu > OpenSIPS Founder and Developerhttp://www.opensips-solutions.com > > On 15.06.2015 12:32, John Nash wrote: > > I have modified my proxy config to support topology_hiding function of > dialog module. But I see lot of dialog related errors like .. > > ERROR:dialog:push_reply_in_dialog: [487] reply in dlg state [2]: missing > TAG param in TO hdr > ERROR:dialog:w_validate_dialog: null dialog > > I am just wondering if my configuration is correct. How functions like > loose_route(); match_dialog();, Validate_dialog(), fix_route_dialog should > be used in production environment to cover all cases. > > From documentation I find code snippets explaining application for each > function but how they all work together in topology_hiding function > scenario? > > PS: I can send my config in case someone needs to have a look. > > John > > > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing > listUsers@lists.opensips.orghttp://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > > >
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
