OK, thank you !
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com
On 28.09.2015 14:58, Pete Kelly wrote:
Done https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/issues/656
On 28 September 2015 at 12:32, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
<bog...@opensips.org <mailto:bog...@opensips.org>> wrote:
That is true Pete,
Could you open a bug report on the GITHUB tracker please ?
Regards,
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com
On 28.09.2015 14:27, Pete Kelly wrote:
On 28 September 2015 at 12:23, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
<bog...@opensips.org <mailto:bog...@opensips.org>> wrote:
Hi Pete,
You mean that ideally the username part of Contact URI should
be preserve through TH ?
Yes, and also the domain, which would need to be preserved if the
UAS wanted to 302 to a completely different URI?
Regards,
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com
On 23.09.2015 11:40, Pete Kelly wrote:
This is something I have noticed for a while now and came
across it again the other day.
Basically if you are using topology hiding and the UAS sends
a 302, the data (new $ru) in the Contact header is not
persisted to the UAC, meaning topology hiding is not valid
in a scenario where a 302 may be found.
Is there a known way to get round this currently (am I
missing something in the docs!)
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org <mailto:Users@lists.opensips.org>
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
