Perhaps you should try to find out why there are now more RR headers -
it is likely that the request is spiraling through the proxy itself.
Generally speaking you should not remove the record route headers.
-Eric
On 01/14/2016 02:16 PM, Rodrigo Pimenta Carvalho wrote:
Dear OpenSIPS-Users;
Suddenly my opensips started to add 2 Record-Routes header fields to
messages it is handling. Ex: when forward a simple SIP-INVITE.
One header field has a private IP and another has a public IP.
I would like to take control of Record-Routes and then avoid opensips
adding that one with private IP.
Is it possible?
If yes, when a SIP-OK arrives in a callee, the callee will send
SIP-ACK to the public IP and then the OpenSIPS will receive it. If I
let the header field with private IP there, it causes problem when
opensips is behind a NAT, with callee, but the caller is outside the
local network.
Can I proceed removing one Record-Route or it is a bad idea?
Any hint will be very helpful!
Best regards.
RODRIGO PIMENTA CARVALHO
Inatel Competence Center
Software
Ph: +55 35 3471 9200 RAMAL 979
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
