Hi Stas,
While looking around for this xpidf I found this:
http://opensips.org/pipermail/users/2010-April/012336.htmlSo, what is the story with this xpdif ? is it still in use ? was it replaced by pidf+xml ? as I see it died as draft.
Regards, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu OpenSIPS Founder and Developer http://www.opensips-solutions.com On 13.01.2016 18:47, Stas Kobzar wrote:
Hi Bogdan,I do not think the DOCTYPE is the problem here. What I see is that when I use MI to publish this application/xpidf doc, OpenSIPS does not want to parse the document, and if I understand correct, this is because this type of document does not have <tuple> XML branch.You are right, about end-to-end, and if I configure OpenSIPS just to relay SUBSCRIBE/NOTIFY, it should work fine. But I want use OpenSIPS to be in the middle because I have a logic in my application when it is me who change the status (for example with web-interface)So basically my question is, is it going to be supported by OpenSIPS (application/xpidf)? Or as you mentioned, it is basically the work for UA and it is not supposed to be in OpenSIPS?Thank you,On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 7:56 AM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bog...@opensips.org <mailto:bog...@opensips.org>> wrote:Hi Stas, You say you see the DOCTYPE line in NOTIFY packets and this is supported by OpenSIPS ? Now, on Polycom extension - if it is something end-2-end, it means it does not require a presence server and everything should be between end points by using SUBSCRIBE and NOTIFY (no PUBLISH, as this is specific to the presence agent/server model). Am I wrong with this ? Best regards, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu OpenSIPS Founder and Developer http://www.opensips-solutions.com On 12.01.2016 17:10, Stas Kobzar wrote:Hello Bogdan, Thank you for your response. The DOCTYPE within XML is seems to be Microsoft presence format: https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-ca/library/cc246193.aspx I am not sure if it can be used with PUBLISH though. For now I saw it only in NOTIFY packets. Polycom UA is using this type of presence for end-to-end presence between phones. I would like to publish this with MI to change presence status on Polycom phones. Thank you, Stas On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 4:59 AM, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bog...@opensips.org <mailto:bog...@opensips.org>> wrote: Hi Stas, I checked with couple of SIP UACs and I found none using the "DOCTYPE" line the published presence XML. So, I guess you should simply drop such a line in your testing. The "tuple" node is replacing your "atom" node (at least this is what I noticed while trying other UACs). Here is an example of a PUBLISH xml generated by Zoiper: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <presence xmlns="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:pidf" entity="sip:bog...@opensips.org;transport=UDP" <mailto:sip:bog...@opensips.org;transport=UDP>> <tuple id="bogdan" > <status><basic>open</basic> </status> <note>Busy</note> </tuple> </presence> In regards to the crash, even if the XML is not properly formated, it should not crash - can you send me the actual MI command + content to try to reproduce the crash and have it fixed ? Best regards, Bogdan-Andrei Iancu OpenSIPS Founder and Developer http://www.opensips-solutions.com On 04.01.2016 18:49, Stas Kobzar wrote:Hello all and Happy New Year! I have a problem with publishing application/xpidf+xml (Xpidf) presence info with OpenSIPS mi (ver11). It seems like it is not supported. The xpidf xml body is something like this: <?xml version="1.0"?> <!DOCTYPE presence PUBLIC "-//IETF//DTD RFCxxxx XPIDF 1.0//EN" "xpidf.dtd"> <presence> <presentity uri="sip:244@199.182.134.149 <mailto:sip%3A244@199.182.134.149>;method=SUBSCRIBE" /> <atom id="*45244*600"> <address uri="sip:*45244*600@199.182.134.149 <mailto:600@199.182.134.149>;user=ip" priority="0.800000"> <status status="open" /> <msnsubstatus substatus="online" /> </address> </atom> </presence> After browsing around the source I think there are two problems: 1. (in modules/pua/add_events.c:pres_process_body) function from libxml2 xmlParseMemory returns NULL when finds the line <!DOCTYPE presence PUBLIC "-//IETF//DTD RFCxxxx XPIDF 1.0//EN" "xpidf.dtd"> 2. Another problem: when I remove the line above from body there is a call to another function that is looking for "<tuple>" node in xml (in modules/pua/add_events.c:pres_process_body): node= xmlDocGetNodeByName(doc, "tuple", NULL); But there is no "tuple" in xpidf document. So it returns error. 3. As an experiment, I added "<tuple>" inside my presence body and it crashed OpenSIPS with: CRITICAL:core:receive_fd: EOF on 18 Question: Is there a way to make xpidf presence content type work with pua_mi module? Thank you,--Stas Kobzar Developeur VoIP / VoIP Developer Modulis.ca Inc. # Bureau / Office: 514-284-2020 x 246 <tel:514-284-2020%20x%20246> Email: s <http://firstname.lastname>tas.kob...@modulis.ca https://www.modulis.com <https://www.modulis.com/> _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org <mailto:Users@lists.opensips.org> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users--Stas Kobzar Developeur VoIP / VoIP Developer Modulis.ca Inc. # Bureau / Office: 514-284-2020 x 246 <tel:514-284-2020%20x%20246> Email: s <http://firstname.lastname>tas.kob...@modulis.ca https://www.modulis.com <https://www.modulis.com/>-- Stas Kobzar Developeur VoIP / VoIP Developer Modulis.ca Inc. # Bureau / Office: 514-284-2020 x 246 Email: s <http://firstname.lastname>tas.kob...@modulis.ca https://www.modulis.com <https://www.modulis.com/>
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
