We have 200,000 CPS and more in future. Just worried about t_relay() and its
performance. Any idea?
--
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 6, 2016, at 2:44 PM, SamyGo <govoi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I'd ask you to read difference between Load_balancer and Dispatcher module.
> Dispatcher module is not an accurate measure but it is the only option when
> it comes to load balancing REGISTER requests.
>
> Dispatcher is hence very light weight as compared to Load Balancer. For a 200
> CPS calls Load Balancer or Dispatcehr won't be putting any bigger impact
> relative to the business logic itself. For example doing alot of DB queries,
> engaging various other modules etc these things really define how light or
> heavy your system is going to be.
>
> Regards,
> Sammy
>
>
>> On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Satish Patel <satish....@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Any thought on it???
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 4, 2016 at 1:30 PM, Satish Patel <satish....@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > We have dispatcher and we are using very simple code block like following
>> >
>> > if (method=="REGISTER" || method=="INVITE" ) {
>> > ds_select_dst("1", "2");
>> > t_relay();
>> > }
>> >
>> > Does t_relay will keep all transaction in memory? and what will be the
>> > performance issue? we have ~200k cps calls.. what will be the impact?
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Users mailing list
>> Users@lists.opensips.org
>> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
>
> _______________________________________________
> Users mailing list
> Users@lists.opensips.org
> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
