Hi Ben,
Thanks for the clarification. I labeled this as a bug, as whatever you
do in the script, you cannot get the desired (which is valid) behavior.
I got the ticker, we will try to get it fixed shortly.
Regards,
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com
On 27.06.2016 18:06, Newlin, Ben wrote:
Did you mean to say if you set it in request route?
I should clarify that when I am setting the advertised address the
second time it is of course happening in failure_route as the first
request has failed at that point. Perhaps that is the issue?
I will open a bug. Thanks.
Ben Newlin
*From: *Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bog...@opensips.org>
*Date: *Monday, June 27, 2016 at 10:41 AM
*To: *"Newlin, Ben" <ben.new...@inin.com>, "users@lists.opensips.org"
<users@lists.opensips.org>
*Subject: *Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] ACK after set_advertised_address
contains wrong address in VIA header
Hi Ben,
If you set the advertised host / port in branch route, it will have
impact over the entire transaction (all branches). So, any local
replies (CANCEL and ACK) that are constructed by OpenSIPS (for any
branch) will use the same set of advertised values. Which is of course
wrong. Let us come up with the fix (as idea and code).
Could you open a bug report on the GITHUB tracker, please ?
Regards,
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com
On 27.06.2016 15:45, Newlin, Ben wrote:
I always set the advertised address in request route.
Also as the original issue noted the second INVITE does go out
with the correct advertised address in the VIA. It is only the
local ACK for the failed second request that contains the wrong
address in the VIA. So set_advertised_address appears to be
working, but the local generated ACK is not using that address.
Ben Newlin
*From: *Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bog...@opensips.org>
<mailto:bog...@opensips.org>
*Date: *Monday, June 27, 2016 at 5:37 AM
*To: *"users@lists.opensips.org" <mailto:users@lists.opensips.org>
<users@lists.opensips.org> <mailto:users@lists.opensips.org>,
"Newlin, Ben" <ben.new...@inin.com> <mailto:ben.new...@inin.com>
*Subject: *Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] ACK after set_advertised_address
contains wrong address in VIA header
Hi Ben,
Where in the script do you do the first advertise_address ? In the
request route or in a branch route ?
Regards,
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com
On 25.06.2016 03:41, Newlin, Ben wrote:
I have run into the same problem that was described in this
previous post [1], however it doesn’t appear it was ever
solved at the time.
I am using the dispatcher module to route calls to external
carriers and I am using set_advertised_address to set the
outgoing public address prior to sending the request. If the
first destination returns failure, the ACK is sent correctly.
Then I select a different destination and set a different
public address using set_advertised_address. If this second
call also fails, the ACK that is sent out uses the first
advertised address, not the current on for the request.
Has anyone figured this out? I am using 1.11.6.
[1]
http://lists.opensips.org/pipermail/users/2014-August/029779.html
Ben Newlin
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org <mailto:Users@lists.opensips.org>
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
