Hi, Nathan!

Have you tried calling b2b_init_request() with the "a" flag [1]?

[1] http://www.opensips.org/html/docs/modules/2.2.x/b2b_logic.html#id294010

Best regards,

Răzvan Crainea
OpenSIPS Solutions
www.opensips-solutions.com

On 11/26/2016 06:04 AM, Nathan Ward wrote:
Hi all,

I am configuring an SBC with 3 legs - one to the core (i.e. to a registrar and 
routing server), one towards end users, and one towards a provider.
My intent is to make he SBC fairly “dumb”, and not keep state of registrations 
etc.

The provider requires registration and authentication for calls. I generate 
registrations from our core towards our provider for each line, through the SBC 
(forwarding these rather than B2BUA-ing). I also have users registering towards 
our core. Works great.

When we forward an INVITE from our core, the B2BUA creates a new session and 
forwards it to the provider. The provider challenges (401), which is forwarded back 
towards the core. The core ACKs this challenge, and forwards the ACK to the 
provider. Then, the B2BUA deletes the dialog after saying "ACK for a negative 
reply”.

This means that the subsequent authenticated INVITE generates a new instance on 
the B2BUA, and a new Call-ID - which causes the provider to reject this as the 
Call-ID is expected to be consistent across auth/unauth INVITEs.

Worth noting that before we call b2b_init_request, I call “force_send_socket”, 
as we use loopback/virtual addresses for talking with our provider.

- Is this expected behaviour?
- Is there a way to tweak this so that ACK for a 401/407/etc. does not 
immediately tear down the B2BUA entity?
- Can I avoid this by writing my own B2BUA scenario? We are using the built in 
“top hiding” for the moment.

If code is required to permit this model I’m happy to work on this, but before 
I get my hands dirty I thought I’d ask around :-)


We have the same behaviour from User->B2BUA->Core - however for the moment our 
Core doesn’t care about differing Call-ID, which is obviously a problem that I’ll be 
looking at next..!

--
Nathan Ward


_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users


_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to