Thanks Razvan, for experiment i have put dispatcher on Public Interface and second NIC on private interface which is connected to SIP proxy server.
On dispatcher i am not handling any NAT stuff all it does (record_route) Do you think i should put NAT module in dispatcher and what kind of NAT function i should use? On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 4:37 AM, Răzvan Crainea <raz...@opensips.org> wrote: > Hi, Satish! > > You will probably need to have the dispatcher working as a FrontEnd, with > two interfaces that will work in bridge mode. > Since the dispatcher is the one facing the Public internet, he's the one > that should take care of any NAT handling. > > Best regards, > > Răzvan Crainea > OpenSIPS Solutions > www.opensips-solutions.com > > > On 04/16/2017 03:48 AM, Satish Patel wrote: >> >> Any help here? >> >> On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 10:04 AM, Satish Patel <satish....@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> currently we have following design 1 dispatcher and 3 SIP Proxy and >>> every server on Public IP. Dispatcher using as a load-balancer to >>> distribute load on proxy. >>> >>> My dispatcher is very simple and stateless (I am not using record_route() >>> too) >>> >>> Everything working fine, but now we decided to move alls SIP Proxy to >>> Private IP address and just keep dispatcher on Public IP in that case >>> i have to add record_route() function in dispatcher to put itself in >>> path but question is how does NAT will work in this case? who will >>> perform NAT function? >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> Users@lists.opensips.org >> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > > > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > Users@lists.opensips.org > http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users