Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] clusterer module

Denis via Users Wed, 20 Sep 2017 07:19:34 -0700

Hello, Vlad!

It seems, that something wrong on my test Virtual server. I installed two proxies in two different servers (production) and there are no problems with cluster module. Link is up in both proxies.

Sorry for worry about it.

Thank you.

С уважением, Денис.

Best regards, Denis

18.09.2017, 14:25, "Vlad Patrascu" <vl...@opensips.org>:

Hi Denis,
For around 6 minutes since startup of the first proxy, the second proxy is either not fully booted up or the clusterer table is not loaded so it can't reply to its pings. The issue occurs from this point on, but the chunk of log messages you've provided ends soon after so I couldn't pinpoint the problem. Also the other logs weren't really helpful. So could you send a slightly longer sequence of logs from startup?
Regards,
Vlad Patrascu
OpenSIPS Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com
On 09/18/2017 10:54 AM, Denis via Users wrote:
Hello!

Is there any information about problem?

Thank you.

--
С уважением, Денис.
Best regards, Denis

08.09.2017, 13:46, "Denis via Users" <users@lists.opensips.org>:
Hello, Vlad!

Sorry for long answer.

So, here (https://yadi.sk/i/j9a4CZhS3MiJEm) you can find the log file. In this file i tried to display information in chronological order.

In the log file:
opensips2.2. - first proxy
opensipsproxy1 - second proxy

opensipsctl.sh - script for the first proxy
opensipsproxyctl.sh - script for the second proxy
1.1.1.1 - IP of the server (as i mentioned below both proxies are on the same server).

Thank you for any help.

--
С уважением, Денис.
Best regards, Denis

30.08.2017, 13:05, "Vlad Patrascu" <vl...@opensips.org>:
Hi Denis,

I can't really tell what the problem is from the information you've provided (the traces aren't much help as the messages between nodes are binary data). Can you provide some logs relevant to the clusterer (including debug level) from around the time when the nodes first try to establish the links ?

Regards,
Vlad Patrascu
OpenSIPS Developer
http://www.opensips-solutions.com
On 08/30/2017 11:46 AM, Denis via Users wrote:
Hello!

Any information about the problem?

Thank you.

--
С уважением, Денис.
Best regards, Denis

25.08.2017, 16:51, "Denis via Users" <users@lists.opensips.org>:
Hello!

Back to 2.2.5 resolved the problem. I got replication of, for example, dialog/profile
--
С уважением, Денис.
Best regards, Denis

24.08.2017, 17:46, "Denis via Users" <users@lists.opensips.org>:
Hello!

I am developing VoIP architecture with two proxies and one LB.
Between these proxies i have a cluster, using corresponding module. All instances (proxies and LB) are on the same server.
I started from 2.2 and there were no problems with the cluster.
Recently, I upgraded Opensips from 2.2. to 2.3.1 and have got such situation

./opensipsctl.sh fifo clusterer_list
Cluster:: 1
Node:: 2 DB_ID=2 URL="" Enabled=1 Link_state=Probe Next_hop=none Description=none

./opensipsproxyctl.sh fifo clusterer_list
Cluster:: 1
Node:: 1 DB_ID=1 URL="" Enabled=1 Link_state=Up Next_hop=1 Description=none

tcpdump
10:33:47.101956 IP 1.1.1.1.40428 > 1.1.1.1.5040: Flags [P.], seq 3444481492:3444481525, ack 3259636718, win 342, options [nop,nop,TS val 65425778 ecr 65424597], length 33
10:33:47.101984 IP 1.1.1.1.5040 > 1.1.1.1.40428: Flags [.], ack 33, win 6146, options [nop,nop,TS val 65425778 ecr 65425778], length 0
10:33:51.725437 IP 1.1.1.1.40428 > 1.1.1.1.5040: Flags [P.], seq 33:66, ack 1, win 342, options [nop,nop,TS val 65426934 ecr 65425778], length 33
10:33:51.725458 IP 1.1.1.1.5040 > 1.1.1.1.40428: Flags [.], ack 66, win 6146, options [nop,nop,TS val 65426934 ecr 65426934], length 0

and

10:35:12.589476 IP 1.1.1.1.34850 > 1.1.1.1.5041: Flags [P.], seq 1471487774:1471487807, ack 2063326017, win 342, options [nop,nop,TS val 65447150 ecr 65445995], length 33
10:35:12.589491 IP 1.1.1.1.5041 > 1.1.1.1.34850: Flags [.], ack 33, win 342, options [nop,nop,TS val 65447150 ecr 65447150], length 0
10:35:17.158143 IP 1.1.1.1.34850 > 1.1.1.1.5041: Flags [P.], seq 33:66, ack 1, win 342, options [nop,nop,TS val 65448292 ecr 65447150], length 33
10:35:17.158153 IP 1.1.1.1.5041 > 1.1.1.1.34850: Flags [.], ack 66, win 342, options [nop,nop,TS val 65448292 ecr 65448292], length 0

As you can see node 1 cannot see node 2 (Link_state=Probe). The question is why?

Thank you.

--
С уважением, Денис.
Best regards, Denis

,
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
,
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
,
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
,
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
,
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users@lists.opensips.org
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] clusterer module

Reply via email to