I understand correctly that on my side I can not fix this problem? пт, 14 февр. 2020 г. в 17:17, Антон Ершов <suhari...@gmail.com>:
> They can not > > пт, 14 февр. 2020 г., 17:10 johan <jo...@democon.be>: > >> To me 200 OK is perfectly valid. The operator should fix this at his >> side. >> On 14.02.20 15:01, Антон Ершов wrote: >> >> Hello friends! >> we have final equipment that does not meet 200OK correctly. it adds an >> extra space between 200 and OK. from the point of view of rfc is not very >> scary. but there is an operator that cannot handle the given 200OK. I tried >> to fix it with change_reply_status in module sipmsgops. >> but it rewrites the status-line with the same extra space. >> Is this a bug? >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing >> listUsers@lists.opensips.orghttp://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Users mailing list >> Users@lists.opensips.org >> http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >> >
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
