Thank You Sir. I will adjust my config accordingly. Richard
On Tue, Sep 20, 2022 at 7:58 AM Bogdan-Andrei Iancu <bog...@opensips.org> wrote: > Hi Richard, > > having in failure route the initial RURI is the expected behavior. The > idea of failure route is to re-take the process of routing and adding new > branches, totally independent of the branches you tried before (the new > attempts should start from the same "msg" as the previous branches) > > Regards, > > Bogdan-Andrei Iancu > > OpenSIPS Founder and Developer > https://www.opensips-solutions.com > OpenSIPS Summit 27-30 Sept 2022, Athens > https://www.opensips.org/events/Summit-2022Athens/ > > On 9/20/22 12:39 AM, Richard Revels wrote: > > It appears to me that if I set the request uri in a route block and then > use t_relay(,"somedestination proxy") to send the call that when it hits > the failure route (in opensips 3.2.8) the request uri has been set back to > the original uri when the call came in to the proxy. > > Is this expected behaviour? Probably should start with is this my > imagination but it seems to be the case. > > The scenario is that i set a request uri in the route block and a route > header in the branch route and send the call through an outbound proxy and > then in the failure route i change the route header and simply send > straight to the domain in the request uri but that has since reverted so my > INVITE comes back to my proxy on loopback. > > I can adjust my config but want to be sure i understand what is happening > first. > > Richard Revels > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing > listUsers@lists.opensips.orghttp://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > > >
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users@lists.opensips.org http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users