OK, Giovanni, would you take the role of starting a new thread (was your idea :D) here and filling in all the PRACK related requirements that you have in mind at this step - and we can use that as starting point for the discussion.

Regards,

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu

OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
  https://www.opensips-solutions.com
  https://www.siphub.com

On 24.11.2025 09:56, Antonios Psaras wrote:

Hello Bogdan.

Whatever fits you better.

*Antonis*

*From:* Users <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of *Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
*Sent:* Δευτέρα, 24 Νοεμβρίου 2025 09:31
*To:* [email protected]; OpenSIPS users mailling list <[email protected]>; Giovanni Maruzzelli <[email protected]>
*Subject:* Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] 100rel / PRACK Interworking

Hi Giovanni, Johan, Antonios,

Talking about the PRACK, yes, it sounds like a good idea to get such support in the dialog module. And yes, we need to start with drafting the functionality to be provided - should we do this over the #2076 github ticket (mentioned by Giovanni) or open new thread here, backed-up by a GH wiki page to aggregate the requirements ?

Best regards,

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu
OpenSIPS Founder and Developer
   https://www.opensips-solutions.com
   https://www.siphub.com

On 14.11.2025 11:30, Giovanni Maruzzelli wrote:

    > It really is a mess, to me it seems that IMS guys are scared of rtp

    +1 it is an endpoint thing, trunk providers are wrong to ask for
    it (what do they get from it?)

    when you (trunk provider) know that the phone is actually ringing,
    what do you gain? It has meaning when you control the whole chain,
    end-to-end (carriers, IMS) not at all for
    deskphone->itsp->trunk->whatever->carrier->endphone

    But I know they (trunk providers) start to *REQUIRE* PRACK

    So, probably a module, or an extension of an existing module, can
    be warranted and welcome

    Possibly on 3.6.X (that's the last LTS of the 3.0.0 series)

    Let's open a thread on what functionalities can be useful in it?

    -giovanni

    On Fri, Nov 14, 2025 at 10:21 AM Johan De Clercq
    <[email protected]> wrote:

        +1.  I totally agree with you.

        It really is a mess, to me it seems that IMS guys are scared
        of rtp.

        Op vr 14 nov 2025 om 10:03 schreef Walter Schober
        <[email protected]>:

            Hi!

            I also want to point out that its not done with PRACK
            handling alone. Followup (multiple) UPDATE with codec
            changes must be handled, too. Sometimes that lead into
            AMR(WB)/PCMA/G722/OPUS transcoding in early state.
            Including all the DTMF PT issues.

            It is definitely a endpoint / softswitch feature.

            I know those ignorant IMS guys pushing out their internal
            mess to plain RFC3261 interconnects and forcing tasks
            previously done by an MSC to the rest of the world.

            Br

            Walter

            *Von:*Users <[email protected]> *Im Auftrag
            von *Johan De Clercq
            *Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 13. November 2025 16:29
            *An:* [email protected]; OpenSIPS users mailling list
            <[email protected]>
            *Betreff:* Re: [OpenSIPS-Users] 100rel / PRACK Interworking

            Giovanni on a side note, what to do with update ? do you
            handle it locally or do you forward it to your endpoint ?

            BR, Johan.

            Op do 13 nov 2025 om 15:54 schreef Giovanni Maruzzelli
            <[email protected]>:

                Antonio, you may want to update this feature request
                from Johan:
                https://github.com/OpenSIPS/opensips/issues/2076


_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to