Not wanting to hijack my own thread, but have you compiled the g729 codec support into RTPEngine? There are build options you need to use.
Andrew On Fri, 6 Mar 2026 at 00:40, Federico Alves <[email protected]> wrote: > Also, the RTP engine does not record any calls using the g729 codec. > Is there something I am missing? > Philip > > On Thu, Mar 5, 2026 at 5:55 AM Andrew Yager <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I will put money on this being a "you're doing this all the wrong way" > and you're an idiot type issue. > > > > We're running OpenSIPS 3.4.16 with rtpengine 14.0.1.1 and trying to use > the siprec module with rtp_relay for call recording to a VoIPMonitor SRS. > > > > Setup: > > - rtp_relay_engage("rtpengine") called before siprec_start_recording() > > - rtp_relay handles the main call's media successfully (offer/answer > work, RTP flows) > > - SIPREC INVITE is sent to SRS, SRS responds with 200 OK > > - BYE sent to SRS immediately (~1ms after ACK) > > > > What we see in rtpengine debug logs: > > > > The subscribe request sent by rtp_relay uses from-tag: "1" rather than > the actual call participant's tag: > > > > subscribe request: {"call-id": "...", "flags": ["all", "siprec"], > > "from-tag": "1", "command": "subscribe request"} > > > > This succeeds. But the subsequent subscribe answer uses the real callee > tag: > > > > subscribe answer: {"call-id": "...", "from-tag": "ffc01bf7-...", > > "to-tag": "00e36c57...", "command": "subscribe answer"} > > > > rtpengine returns: Failed to process subscription answer > > > > It appears the from-tag "1" in the subscribe request is wrong, because > it should be the actual SIP dialog tag (b2af6068 for caller, ffc01bf7-... > for callee), and so rtpengine can't correlate the subscribe answer back to > the subscription because the from-tag changed between request and answer. > > > > We're using rtp_relay_engage("rtpengine") followed by > siprec_start_recording("sip:x.x.x.x:5099") in ROUTE_INVITE after > create_dialog("B"). Do we need to call siprec_start_recording later, like > in the reply route on the 200 OK? > > > > Is what I'm doing wrong obviously wrong? > > > > Thanks, > > Andrew > > _______________________________________________ > > Users mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users > > _______________________________________________ > Users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users >
_______________________________________________ Users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.opensips.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
