Thaks, but I have tried several configurations including: 

* mixing_mode =  'local-TF' and 'plain' 
* conv_thr = 1.0D-7, 1.0D-6, 1.0D-5, 1.0D-4, 1.0D-3, 1.0D-2, 1.0D-1
and always get the same warning "SCF correction compared to forces is too 
large, reduce conv_thr"

 

Jhon W. Gonz?lez

Universidad T?cnica Federico Santa Mar?a
Fono (56) (32) 2654623 Fax  (56) (32) 2797656
Casilla 110-VALPARAISO
Avenida Espa?a 1680
239-0123 VALPARAISO
CHILE

for QE forum: http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum


----- Mensaje original ----
De: Lorenzo Paulatto <paulatto at sissa.it>
Para: PWSCF Forum <pw_forum at pwscf.org>
Enviado: s?bado, 30 de mayo, 2009 6:29:56
Asunto: Re: [Pw_forum] SCF correction problem in relaxation


Dear John,
it means that your convergence threshold is too big:
>       conv_thr = 1.0D-5 ,
it is at least 10 and at most 10 thousand times larger than an acceptable
convergence threshiold. Either increase it or increase the upscale
parameter.

regards

P.S. you could also try and search the mailing list archive:
<http://www.google.es/search?q=pw_forum+%22SCF+correction+compared+to+forces+is+too+large%22+site%3Ademocritos.it&btnG=Cerca>
please note that the same question has been asked and answered no more
than 7 days ago.

-- 
Lorenzo Paulatto
SISSA  &  DEMOCRITOS (Trieste)
phone: +39 040 3787 511
skype: paulatz
www:  http://people.sissa.it/~paulatto/



----------------------------------------------------------------
  SISSA Webmail https://webmail.sissa.it/
  Powered by SquirrelMail http://www.squirrelmail.org/

_______________________________________________
Pw_forum mailing list
Pw_forum at pwscf.org
http://www.democritos.it/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum



      

Reply via email to