Hi, I have used vc-relax to get the optimum lattice constant for Ti HCP crystal. The result is very close to the experiment data. However, when I tried to calc the total energy at different lattice constant to get the dependency of total energy on the lattice constant, I got the different answer to the optimum lattice constant. Could anyone tell me what's wrong in my simulations? Thanks.
Dongsheng The input for vc-relax method: &control prefix='ti', pseudo_dir = '/home1/01993/zhdsheng/espresso/pseudo/', outdir='/scratch/01993/zhdsheng/Ti_K6L6.0/', calculation='vc-relax', restart_mode='from_scratch' / &system ibrav= 4, celldm(1) =6.0,celldm(3) =1.633, nat= 2, ntyp= 1, occupations='smearing', smearing='marzari-vanderbilt', degauss=0.06, ecutwfc =150, / &electrons / &ions / &cell cell_dynamics='bfgs' / ATOMIC_SPECIES Ti 47.867 Ti.pbe-mt_fhi.UPF ATOMIC_POSITIONS Ti 0.000000000000 0.000000000000 0.000000000000 Ti 0.666666666666 0.333333333333 0.50000000000 K_POINTS automatic 6 6 6 1 1 1 The optimum lattice constant from this input file is 5.576 The input for manual optimization: template.in: &control prefix='ti', pseudo_dir = '/home1/01993/zhdsheng/espresso/pseudo/', outdir='/scratch/01993/zhdsheng/Ti_try/', restart_mode='from_scratch' / &system ibrav= 4, celldm(1) =alat,celldm(3) =1.633, nat= 2, ntyp= 1, occupations='smearing', smearing='marzari-vanderbilt', degauss=0.06, ecutwfc =150, / &electrons / &ions / ATOMIC_SPECIES Ti 47.867 Ti.pbe-mt_fhi.UPF ATOMIC_POSITIONS Ti 0.000000000000 0.000000000000 0.000000000000 Ti 0.666666666666 0.333333333333 0.50000000000 K_POINTS automatic 6 6 6 1 1 1 alat is the lattice variable. The result from this input file is: alat etotal 5.0760 -13.57602170 5.1760 -13.61996733 5.2760 -13.65721285 5.3760 -13.68841125 5.4760 -13.71412487 5.5760 -13.73484556 5.6760 -13.75101618 5.7760 -13.76303624 5.8760 -13.77128114 5.9760 -13.77609614 6.0760 -13.77784664 6.1760 -13.77685770 6.2760 -13.77353840 6.3760 -13.76853094 6.4760 -13.76290015 6.5760 -13.75652953 6.6760 -13.74869787 6.7760 -13.74207406 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://pwscf.org/pipermail/pw_forum/attachments/20130518/febbbd94/attachment.html