Dear Amir-who-is-missing-the-affiliation-in-the-post,

A small clarification to Lorenzo's-who-did-not-even-sign-the-post answer, in principle both would mathematically give the same accuracy, but due to the pecularities in the density of states in particular regions of the Brillouin zone one or the other could lead to faster convergence, like Lorenzo wrote. Traditionally one tries to avoid the Gamma point, as one thinks that it is an "extreme point" in the band structure (it is a local minimum or maximum of each band, as their derivatives with respect to any direction in k space is zero). Earlier this was of more importance, when one could afford few k points and/or the systems were small, nowadays choosing one or the other is no longer that important, as the increased computing power makes the inclusion of more k points or larger cell easier.

And just to bore all the reader of the Forum, I remind you that in hexagonal cell it is better to keep a Gamma-centred Monkhorst-Pack grid, as otherwise the k point grid will get symmetrised (if this would not be done, the grid would have a lower symmetry than the hexagonal cell itself).

And for historical note, the original Monkhorst-Pack grid corresponds to the case "1 1 1", the shift was actually introduced later (when they were indeed notified about the problem in the hexagonal case; references are a Comment and Reply to Comment to the original Article of Monkhorst and Pack). So in this sense the convention in QE of "shifted" and "unshifted" k point sets are opposite to the ones of the original literature. :)

    Greetings from Paris,

       apsi

-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-=*=-
  Ari Paavo Seitsonen / ari.p.seitso...@iki.fi / http://www.iki.fi/~apsi/
    Ecole Normale Supérieure (ENS), Département de Chimie, Paris
    Mobile (F) : +33 789 37 24 25    (CH) : +41 79 71 90 935


On Tue, 8 Mar 2016, Lorenzo Paulatto wrote:


If you use 1's the grid will be shifted by half its step, this makes the 
integrals of the grid convergence faster in some cases.

On 8 Mar 2016 8:51 p.m., "Mofrad, Amir Mehdi (MU-Student)" 
<am...@mail.missouri.edu> wrote:

      Dear all QE users and developers,


      I have a question about the K_POINTS card in the input file. What is the 
difference between using shifted (1 1 1) and unshifted (0 0 0)?


      Best,



      Amir M. Mofrad    


_______________________________________________
Pw_forum mailing list
Pw_forum@pwscf.org
http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum


_______________________________________________
Pw_forum mailing list
Pw_forum@pwscf.org
http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum

Reply via email to