Dear Mohammad

When you perform a calculation with smearing your variational total energy has an additional term which in the final PW summary of contributions to total energies is labeled (-TS).

This term is expected to be negative, and proportional to the value of degauss you are using. Which is what you are observing.

The appropriate value for degauss depends on the precision you need for total energy and on how many k-points you can afford to use in your calculation.

You should chose a value of degauss for which the absolute value of the -TS contribution is smaller than the precision you need to achieve. On the other hand the smaller the value of degauss you use, the denser will be the needed k-point mesh to reach convergence.

greetings - pietro


On 07/02/2017 08:31, mohammadreza hosseini wrote:
Dear all
I am performing optimization of degauss for a MOF structure. As I decrease degauss, The total energy increases. What is the problem?
Is it possible describe how to obtain proper number for degauss?
Best

    -----Original Message-----
    From: pw_forum-requ...@pwscf.org
    To: pw_forum@pwscf.org
    Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2017 12:00:03 +0100
    Subject: Pw_forum Digest, Vol 115, Issue 6
    Send Pw_forum mailing list submissions to
    pw_forum@pwscf.org <mailto:pw_forum%40pwscf.org>

    To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
    http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
    or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
    pw_forum-requ...@pwscf.org <mailto:pw_forum-request%40pwscf.org>

    You can reach the person managing the list at
    pw_forum-ow...@pwscf.org <mailto:pw_forum-owner%40pwscf.org>

    When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
    than "Re: Contents of Pw_forum digest..."


    Today's Topics:

       1. Re: installation error: linking to Fortran libraries from C
          fails (Amel Alhassan)


    ----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Message: 1
    Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2017 00:23:35 +0300
    From: Amel Alhassan <alhassan.a...@gmail.com
    <mailto:alhassan.amel%40gmail.com>>
    Subject: Re: [Pw_forum] installation error: linking to Fortran
       libraries from C fails
    To: PWSCF Forum <pw_forum@pwscf.org <mailto:pw_forum%40pwscf.org>>
    Message-ID:
<CA+mzp40G6H-3p6OzF3JccZ=eerb+yhx8vjdv6k6jajjk6aq...@mail.gmail.com
    <mailto:EeRB%2BYHX8VJDV6K6jajjk6aQYvw%40mail.gmail.com>>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

    Hello,

    I downloaded colorgcc from here

    http://packages.ubuntu.com/precise/all/colorgcc/download

    Then, I was able to run ./configure successfully.

    Then

    $ make all


    ran for quiet some time and ended with

    gfortran -o xspectra.x  xspectra.o ./xspectra_mod.o ./radin_mod.o
    > ./mygetK.o ./ipoolscatter.o ./lr_sm1_psi.o ./orthoUatwfc_k.o
    > ./read_k_points.o ./reset_k_points_and_reinit.o ./paw_gipaw.o
    > ./gipaw_module.o ./init_gipaw_1.o ./init_gipaw_2.o \

    ../../PW/src/libpw.a  ../../Modules/libqemod.a -g -pthread
    > ../../iotk/src/libiotk.a ../../flib/flib.a ../../clib/clib.a
    > ../../flib/ptools.a  -llapack  -lblas  -lfftw3  -lblas

    ( cd ../../bin ; ln -fs ../XSpectra/src/xspectra.x . )

    make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/amel/espresso-5.1.1/XSpectra/src'

    make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/amel/espresso-5.1.1/XSpectra'

    touch make-xspectra

    make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/amel/espresso-5.1.1/install'




    I assume there is nothing wrong; unless make[ ] means an error(?!)

    I guess I am equipped to do some simulations now :-)

    Thank you very much Paolo and Phanikumar Pentyala

    Best regards,
    Amel

    On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 8:47 PM, Amel Alhassan
    <alhassan.a...@gmail.com <mailto:alhassan.amel%40gmail.com>>
    wrote:

    > Thank you Paolo for translation :D I couldn't get what was the error
    > actually.
    >
    > Ok, now checking for gcc and colorgcc, it seems like there is gcc
    > installed but no colorgcc and I can't even install it.
    >
    > running
    >
    >> $ sudo apt-get install colorgcc
    >
    > I get
    >
    >>  E: Package 'colorgcc' has no installation candidate
    >
    >
    > Can I make espresso use gcc instead? How?
    >
    > Kind regards,
    > Amel
    >
    >
    > On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 7:14 PM, Paolo Giannozzi
    <p.gianno...@gmail.com <mailto:p.giannozzi%40gmail.com>>
    > wrote:
    >
    >> Out of the hundreds of lines you posted, the only relevant ones:
    >>
    >> >> /usr/bin/colorgcc -O3 -D__GFORTRAN -D__STD_F95 -D__FFTW3
    >> -I../include  -c customize_signals.c
    >> >>
    >> >> make[1]: /usr/bin/colorgcc: Command not found
    >>
    >> clearly show that you are trying to use "/usr/bin/colorgcc" as C
    >> compiler, and that there is no "/usr/bin/colorgcc" in your system
    >>
    >> Paolo
    >> _______________________________________________
    >> Pw_forum mailing list
    >> Pw_forum@pwscf.org <mailto:Pw_forum%40pwscf.org>
    >> http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
    >>
    >
    >
    >
    > --
    > Amel Shamseldeen Ali Alhassan
    > Lecturer
    > Nile College
    > Khartoum, Sudan
    > +249 915382411
    >



    --
    Amel Shamseldeen Ali Alhassan
    Lecturer
    Nile College
    Khartoum, Sudan
    +249 915382411
    -------------- next part --------------
    An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
    URL:
    
http://pwscf.org/pipermail/pw_forum/attachments/20170206/8568dc86/attachment-0001.html


    ------------------------------

    _______________________________________________
    Pw_forum mailing list
    Pw_forum@pwscf.org <mailto:Pw_forum%40pwscf.org>
    http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
    <http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum>

    End of Pw_forum Digest, Vol 115, Issue 6
    ****************************************



_______________________________________________
Pw_forum mailing list
Pw_forum@pwscf.org
http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum

_______________________________________________
Pw_forum mailing list
Pw_forum@pwscf.org
http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum

Reply via email to