Hello,

My guess: you have to remove one of the imaginary frequencies (most probably 
the smallest one) by following the corresponding eigenvector (=moving the atoms 
accordingly). Then, you will have to make sure that the transition state 
connects the reactants and products you are interested in.

HTH,
Pascal

Pascal Boulet
—
Professor in computational chemistry - DEPARTEMENT OF CHEMISTRY
Aix-Marseille University - ST JEROME - Avenue Escadrille Normandie Niemen - 
F-13013 Marseille - FRANCE
Tél: +33(0)4 13 55 18 10 - Fax : +33(0)4 13 55 18 50
Site : http://madirel.univ-amu.fr/pages_web_BOULET_PASCAL/infos - Email : 
pascal.bou...@univ-amu.fr




Le 13 nov. 2017 à 12:44, JAY Antoine <antoine....@isae-supaero.fr> a écrit :

> Dear all,
> I have been using NEB to obtain the Delta E and phonon DOS at 
> begining/end/saddle point to properly evaluate the vibrationnal entropy 
> contribution in the transition state theory.
> Commonly, one frequency in "negative" at the saddle point, the one that is 
> "responssible" of the transition and the following of its eigen vector from 
> the initial state give the minimum energy path.
> However, when two phonon frequencies are "negatives" at the saddle point, 
> that means that at least 3  energy minima are link together to the same 
> saddle point.
> The transition state theory cannot be applied there as the preexponential 
> term is the ratio of the 3N-3 phonon frequencies of initial state over the 
> 3N-4 frequencies of the saddle point, giving the dimension of a time (state 
> life time)
> Using 3N-5 frequencies without the two negatives ones would not have a 
> physical meaning for the initial partition function.
> 
> Any idea on how to treat such a problem to evaluate the transition rate would 
> be appreciated.
> 
> Best regards.
> 
> Antoine Jay _______________________________________________
> Pw_forum mailing list
> Pw_forum@pwscf.org
> http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum

_______________________________________________
Pw_forum mailing list
Pw_forum@pwscf.org
http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum

Reply via email to