It does not work. I get this error:

diff: unrecognized option '--git'

JC
El 26/01/2018 a las 19:34, Paolo Giannozzi escribió:
Please try this patch:
diff --git a/Modules/latgen.f90 b/Modules/latgen.f90
index 39a12f81a..6d00f060a 100644
--- a/Modules/latgen.f90
+++ b/Modules/latgen.f90
@@ -571,7 +571,7 @@ SUBROUTINE abc2celldm ( ibrav, a,b,c,cosab,cosac,cosbc, celldm )
      celldm(5) = cosac
      celldm(6) = cosab
      !
-  ELSE IF ( ibrav ==-12 ) THEN
+  ELSE IF ( ibrav ==-12 .OR. ibrav ==-13 ) THEN
      !
      ! ... monoclinic P lattice, unique axis b
      !
P.

On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 6:51 PM, José C. Conesa <jccon...@icp.csic.es <mailto:jccon...@icp.csic.es>> wrote:

    Hi,

    Using qe-6.2.1 I was puzzled by some pw.x results obtained when
    using an input file containing these lines:

    ....

     &system
        ibrav=-13,uniqueb=.true.
        space_group=12
        A=14.3100,B=6.3383,C=10.1995
        cosAC=-0.70644
    ...

    until I realized that the corresponding output contained these lines:

    celldm(1)=  27.041981  celldm(2)=   0.442928 celldm(3)=   0.712753
         celldm(4)=   0.000000  celldm(5)=   0.000000 celldm(6)=  
    0.000000

    That is, the monoclinic angle was not taken into account. Giving
    the angle parameter with cosAB or cos BC changed nothing. I only
    could obtain the correct resullts using an input file with these
    lines:

    .....
     &system
        ibrav=-13,uniqueb=.true.
        space_group=12
        A=14.3100,B=6.3383,C=10.1995
        celldm(5)=-0.70644

    .....

    Then I get in output, as expected:

    celldm(1)=  27.041981  celldm(2)=   0.442928 celldm(3)=   0.712753
         celldm(4)=   0.000000  celldm(5)=  -0.706440 celldm(6)=  
    0.000000

    If I change the unit cell definition so that the unique axis is c,
    and use ibrav=13 (with the default uniqueb=.false.) then cosAB is
    read correctly. Not reading cosAC when ibrav=-13 is obviously a
    bug that should be corrected. I did not verify (yet) if the same
    problem occurs with ibrav=-12, but I suspect it may occur also. If
    some problem occurs also for other negative ibrav values, I do not
    know.

    By the way, when explaining the different ibrav values the manual
    should include a mention (now absent) to the possibility of having
    ibrav=-13, and when explaining both ibrav=-12 and ibrav=-13 it
    should be said, at that same place, that one must add
    uniqueb=.true. (although actually specifying uniqueb should not be
    necessary, it might be adopted automatically by the program when
    these two negative ibrav values are detected).

    Regards,

-- José C. Conesa
    Instituto de Catálisis y Petroleoquímica, CSIC
    Marie Curie 2, Cantoblanco
    28049 Madrid, Spain
    Tel.(+34)915854766 <tel:+34%20915%2085%2047%2066>


    
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>
        Libre de virus. www.avast.com
    
<https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=emailclient>


    <#m_-6946635839658223488_DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2>

    _______________________________________________
    Pw_forum mailing list
    Pw_forum@pwscf.org <mailto:Pw_forum@pwscf.org>
    http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum
    <http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum>




--
Paolo Giannozzi, Dip. Scienze Matematiche Informatiche e Fisiche,
Univ. Udine, via delle Scienze 208, 33100 Udine, Italy
Phone +39-0432-558216, fax +39-0432-558222



_______________________________________________
Pw_forum mailing list
Pw_forum@pwscf.org
http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum

--
José C. Conesa
Instituto de Catálisis y Petroleoquímica, CSIC
Marie Curie 2, Cantoblanco
28049 Madrid, Spain
Tel. (+34)915854766



---
El software de antivirus Avast ha analizado este correo electrónico en busca de 
virus.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
_______________________________________________
Pw_forum mailing list
Pw_forum@pwscf.org
http://pwscf.org/mailman/listinfo/pw_forum

Reply via email to