Dear Kondrin
Thank you for your suggestion. I actually followed the S Ponce lecture
notes from the following link to calculate el-ph coupling constant.
https://indico.ictp.it/event/8301/session/96/contribution/534/material/0/0.pdf.
But in your message here
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/pipermail/users/2022-September/049463.html
you suggest to include la2f = .true for q2r, matdyn.x files as well. After
that we should post process the files to get lambda value without using
lambda.x. Am I right in understanding your message clearly. ??
Regards
K Ramesh Kumar
Assistant Professor
GITAM, University
Vizag, India


On Thu, Oct 27, 2022 at 1:53 PM Ramesh Kumar Kamadurai <rkama...@gitam.edu>
wrote:

> Dear users
> I am trying to calculate el-Ph coupling constant and other properties for
> a superconductor. The input file is attached. I am a bit stuck with
> VC-Relax calculation as the system is not able to stabilize at 0.0 kbar. I
> followed all the suggestions given in forum
> 1. Increased Cut-off to maximum
> 2. Tried USPP,NC, Mixed and currently running with PBE-Sol
> 3. Sequentially done 2 VC Relax calculation but i am not able to sort out
> the issue.
> &CONTROL
>     calculation   = "vc-relax"
>     etot_conv_thr =  4.00000e-05
>     forc_conv_thr =  1.00000e-04
>     max_seconds   =  1.72800e+05
>     nstep         = 100
>     outdir        = "/home/sjacobs/tmp/"
>     prefix        = "PDZ-VCRELAX"
>     pseudo_dir    = "C:\Users\RAMESH\.burai\.pseudopot"
>     tprnfor       = .TRUE.
>     tstress       = .TRUE.
>     verbosity     = "high"
> /
>
> &SYSTEM
>     a           =  6.36512e+00
>     degauss     =  7.34986e-03
>     ecutrho     =  6.40000e+02
>     ecutwfc     =  8.00000e+01
>     ibrav       = 2
>     nat         = 4
>     nosym       = .FALSE.
>     nspin       = 1
>     ntyp        = 3
>     occupations = "smearing"
>     smearing    = "marzari-vanderbilt"
> /
>
> &ELECTRONS
>     conv_thr         =  8.00000e-10
>     electron_maxstep = 80
>     mixing_beta      =  4.00000e-01
>     startingpot      = "atomic"
>     startingwfc      = "atomic+random"
> /
>
> &IONS
>     ion_dynamics = "bfgs"
> /
>
> &CELL
>     cell_dofree    = "all"
>     cell_dynamics  = "bfgs"
>     press          =  0.00000e+00
>     press_conv_thr =  5.00000e-01
> /
>
> K_POINTS {automatic}
> 12 12 12  0 0 0
>
> ATOMIC_SPECIES
> Ga     69.72300  Ga.pbesol-dnl-rrkjus_psl.1.0.0.UPF
> Pd    106.42000  Pd_ONCV_PBEsol-1.0.upf
> Zr     91.22400  zr_pbesol_v1.uspp.F.UPF
>
> ATOMIC_POSITIONS {crystal}
> Zr      0.000000   0.000000   0.000000
> Ga      0.493162   0.493162   0.493162
> Pd      0.739743   0.739743   0.739743
> Pd      0.246581   0.246581   0.246581
>
> The output stress is given below
> entering subroutine stress ...
>           total   stress  (Ry/bohr**3)                   (kbar)     P=
>  2.67
>      entering subroutine stress ...
>           total   stress  (Ry/bohr**3)                   (kbar)     P=
> -0.41
>      entering subroutine stress ...
>           total   stress  (Ry/bohr**3)                   (kbar)     P=
> -0.82
>      entering subroutine stress ...
>           total   stress  (Ry/bohr**3)                   (kbar)     P=
>  0.56
>      entering subroutine stress ...
>           total   stress  (Ry/bohr**3)                   (kbar)     P=
>  0.13
>      entering subroutine stress ...
>           total   stress  (Ry/bohr**3)                   (kbar)     P=
> -0.08
>      entering subroutine stress ...
>           total   stress  (Ry/bohr**3)                   (kbar)     P=
> -0.23
>      entering subroutine stress ...
>           total   stress  (Ry/bohr**3)                   (kbar)     P=
> -0.35
>      entering subroutine stress ...
>           total   stress  (Ry/bohr**3)                   (kbar)     P=
> -0.50
>      entering subroutine stress ...
>           total   stress  (Ry/bohr**3)                   (kbar)     P=
> -0.63
>      entering subroutine stress ...
>           total   stress  (Ry/bohr**3)                   (kbar)     P=
> -0.77
>      entering subroutine stress ...
>           total   stress  (Ry/bohr**3)                   (kbar)     P=
> -0.83
> My question is
> What is the optimal pressure value to avoid negative frequencies for
> electron phonon calculation ?
> Is there any mistake in my input file ?
> Thanks in advance
> Regards
> Ramesh
> Asst. Professor
> GITAM University
> Vizag, India
>
>
_______________________________________________
The Quantum ESPRESSO community stands by the Ukrainian
people and expresses its concerns about the devastating
effects that the Russian military offensive has on their
country and on the free and peaceful scientific, cultural,
and economic cooperation amongst peoples
_______________________________________________
Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX (www.max-centre.eu)
users mailing list users@lists.quantum-espresso.org
https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to