Dear Vivek,
> I want to predict the self-consistent Hubbard parameter using HP code. Please have a look here: https://www.materialscloud.org/learn/sections/tctKdH/advanced-quantum-espresso-tutorial-2022 > ...but the structure remains the same. >From your input and output files I see this: OLD CELL_PARAMETERS (angstrom) 5.8969998360 0.0000000000 0.0000000000 0.0000000000 10.2159996033 0.0000000000 -1.9672647655 0.0000000000 6.3670060311 NEW CELL_PARAMETERS (angstrom) 5.771620672 0.000000000 0.036554788 0.000000000 10.142807293 0.000000000 -1.885622677 0.000000000 6.187226171 So there is some change. It is not what you expect? > conv_thr = 1.d-6 Try 1.d-10 or even smaller > forc_conv_thr = 1.d-3 Try forc_conv_thr = 1.d-4 or 1.d-5 and etot_conv_thr = 1.d-5 or 1.d-6 Have a look also here: https://www.materialscloud.org/work/tools/qeinputgenerator HTH Iurii -- Dr. Iurii TIMROV Senior Research Scientist Theory and Simulation of Materials (THEOS) Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne (EPFL) CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland +41 21 69 34 881 http://people.epfl.ch/265334 ________________________________ From: users <users-boun...@lists.quantum-espresso.org> on behalf of Vivekanand Shukla <vivekanand.shu...@chalmers.se> Sent: Friday, November 25, 2022 4:34:20 PM To: users@lists.quantum-espresso.org Subject: [QE-users] Problem in vc-relax calculation with Hubbard U in magnetic system Dear all, I am trying to run a vc-relax calculation for CoPS3 in bulk with the Hubbard U parameter. CoPS3 results in off-lattice parameters without Hubbard U. I checked it with VASP, and it seems realistic. However, in QE, the Hubbard U parameter has no effect on the lattice parameter. It remains off with or without U. I can see the Hubbard effect in forces in the output file, but it does not reflect on the lattice parameter in QE output. I want to predict the self-consistent Hubbard parameter using HP code. It does not make sense if I do not get the inclusion of the U parameter right in the first place. I used QE versions 6.4.1, 6.7, and 7.0 and various convergence strategies, but the structure remains the same. Could anyone please suggest anything wrong with the calculation? Please find one of the input and output files in the attached link. https://cloudstore.zih.tu-dresden.de/index.php/s/8cCf3N8qd3swW5d [https://cloudstore.zih.tu-dresden.de/core/img/favicon-fb.png]<https://cloudstore.zih.tu-dresden.de/index.php/s/8cCf3N8qd3swW5d> Cloudstore<https://cloudstore.zih.tu-dresden.de/index.php/s/8cCf3N8qd3swW5d> cloudstore.zih.tu-dresden.de Cloudstore - based on <a href="https://nextcloud.com/\";>Nextcloud</a> Sincerely Vivek Postdoctoral Researcher Technical University Dresden
_______________________________________________ The Quantum ESPRESSO community stands by the Ukrainian people and expresses its concerns about the devastating effects that the Russian military offensive has on their country and on the free and peaceful scientific, cultural, and economic cooperation amongst peoples _______________________________________________ Quantum ESPRESSO is supported by MaX (www.max-centre.eu) users mailing list users@lists.quantum-espresso.org https://lists.quantum-espresso.org/mailman/listinfo/users
