I don't even know what you mean by "declared with 'rfx'".

On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 11:53 PM, Denis Fateyev <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello,
> Since it was declared with "rfx", what behavior you have expected?
>
> ---
> wbr, Denis.
>
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 4:35 AM, Ben Tilly <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> For instance perl-DBI-1.616-1.el5.rfx.x86_64.rpm contains
>> /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread-multi/DBD/File.pm
>> which causes it to conflict with
>> repoforge/perl-DBD-File-0.34-1.2.el5.rf.noarch.rpm.
>>
>> Is there a standard way to report these?
>> _______________________________________________
>> users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.repoforge.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.repoforge.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
>
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.repoforge.org/mailman/listinfo/users

Reply via email to