On Fri, 2011-08-19 at 10:16 +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > What this list "lacks" compared to others (Yum, CentOS-*, ElRepo, > OpenOffice...) is the changed Reply address to point to mailing-list > e-mail address.
This is exactly what you said earlier (at least my English parser yields same results in both cases), but this is not true. Just check the headers yourself as I suggested: Message-ID: <[email protected]> Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2011 10:16:25 +0200 From: Ljubomir Ljubojevic <[email protected]> Organization: PL Computers / PL Systems User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20110622) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Discussions regarding Repoforge for users <[email protected]> References: ... In-Reply-To: <1313741029.2591.5.camel@newpride> Subject: Re: [users] mrepo comps.xml for EL6 ... Reply-To: [email protected], Discussions regarding Repoforge for users <[email protected]> The list does everything exactly as it should. > Since there is no Reply-To address, my Thunderbird 2.x > (at least until I finally reinstall my system with C6) chooses From > field as a reply address. All other ml's I am on set Reply-To address > so the reply always goes to the ml, not to the individual I responded > to. So I have to chose Reply-To-All and then to delete the personal > address of the person I am replying to. I have no idea regarding Thunderbird, in fact, this is the MUA that I like least of all; Evolution works just fine. -- Sincerely yours, Yury V. Zaytsev _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.repoforge.org/mailman/listinfo/users
