On Sun, 28 Aug 2011, Yury V. Zaytsev wrote: > On Sun, 2011-08-28 at 12:14 +0200, Dag Wieers wrote: >> >> scons 1.2.0 is a noarch package and as a consequence it is in both >> 32bit and 64bit repositories. > > This makes me think that probably the best way to go for us now is to > backport scons from RHEL6 to RHEL5- and give up on the old SPEC, because > it's just so horribly outdated and broken.
Yes, seems reasonable. But that also means that we should track new RHEL6 packages and backport those too. We don't have any software to do something like this. (we have more such packages that could take advantage of this). > If memory is not cheating on me, I was the one to RFX it on RHEL6 just > to solve the immediate problem of it trying to overwrite the stock > package. > > I will create an issue at Github so that I won't forget to get back to > this problem later. Thanks ! -- -- dag wieers, [email protected], http://dag.wieers.com/ -- dagit linux solutions, [email protected], http://dagit.net/ [Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors] _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.repoforge.org/mailman/listinfo/users
