Am 20.05.2013 um 20:53 schrieb Todd Lyons <[email protected]>: > On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 5:42 AM, Leon Fauster > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Am 20.05.2013 um 11:58 schrieb Richard Lloyd <[email protected]>: >>> >>> It's not clear to me why Repoforge has exactly the same RPM version as >>> Fedora >>> EPEL either - is it normal policy to allow such redundancy? >>> >> >> Repoforge has nothing to do with EPEL - therefore such "incompatibilities" >> can exist. Repoforge >> is considered as 3rd party repository. It is best practice to not mix 3rd >> party repos. > > He's not saying that RepoForge is the same as EPEL. He's saying that > the RepoForge mcrypt package puts the wrong configuration setting in > the mcrypt.ini file, whereas the EPEL version puts the correct > configuration setting. He's requesting that RepoForge mcrypt php > package be fixed to have the correct module name in the mcrypt.ini > file so that php can actually find the correct shared object when it > looks for it.
Hello Todd, sure and valid - i did not want to smother Richard's request. My reply just addresses the last phrase of Richards's request (see above) - thats all :-) -- Best regards, LF _______________________________________________ users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.repoforge.org/mailman/listinfo/users
